Laserfiche WebLink
'�'JC'_'.:: <br />� ` ��,,, <br />'' 1 } S�i. � 41'". :'q ay4_ <br />� <br />hen Callahan <br />Celia Strong <br />September 7, 1978 <br />Page Two (Drainage Complaint) <br />� <br />G'�:/l.�t.Er..:l t.._._i. ......rrL.,l�)fl <br />that if there were any drainage pla• �s, that perhaps he could obtain a copy from <br />the developer at 607 S. Broadaay.�MIt was further_explained to Mr. Gill that <br />__ ------- <br />- <br />continued development at 607 S. Broadway was merely the completion of Phases 2 and <br />3 of Y�.ie ozigina7. development and because the development took place prior to th� <br />adoption'of"the Ordinance� the Drainage Ordinance did not apply to the new <br />___ _- <br />building permits, -- "" -- _.,- - , iJi`% <br />G � ��/'v <br />Nlr. Gill de.manded to ]:now why no drainage plans were required and insisted that y�-=%/,f�� <br />the Ordinance did require compliance, He further insisted that we should waive <br />compliance of the r]orthern property. <br />I explained to Mr. Gill that the issues were separate; that even if there was an <br />error made on the 607 S. Broadway property, the error woul.d not remove the City's � <br />responsibility to enforce the Ordinance on new developments. I explained that I `% <br />was satisfied that the 607 S. Broadway development was correctly processed; but� � <br />i�he wt^,nted to pi:rsue the issue, then he was encouraged to request, in writing, <br />that th� developer at 607 S. IIroadway be required to confozm to the Drainage <br />Ordinance. <br />Mr. Gill repeatedly demande3 to know why the plans iaere not required, <br />Aiter I had explained the issues 3 separate times, and after spending an excess <br />of 35 ninutes on the phone� I informed t�Ir. Gill that I had explained the procedure <br />to him and if he had another questiont I�aould gladly make an attempt at assisting <br />him, but that i�aould not pursue the same series of answers. <br />Dtr. Gill rranted to know who else he could talk to. I encouraged him to talk to <br />the City Attorney� if he felt we were in violation of the Ordinance, <br />Dlr. Gill stated that he does not intend to make a written request� but it is <br />apparent that he will continue to pursue these issues. <br />In an attempt to piece Mr. Gill's "obsession" together, I have learned that Mr. <br />Gill on at least two previous issues has been a chronic "thorn". <br />There does not appear� at this time, to be any merit in any of the issues (of <br />public responsibility) brought up by trlr. Gill� and I don't believe there is <br />anything we can do to help hir. Gill resolve the private drainage problems. <br />� � s�ss cj-� �` 3Lza if -18-�� f j•c-�c.� <br />CIS:i5�539 �:,�C��.,C iRiwlt`� dr ^•' � ~ 4C /4 Z-27'7cY .G;,,�sh�%-� <br />J <br />4/4d '3-2G-7$ �"��cs...�. <br />cc: Laurel Harnes ¢2l3 ¢���_7$ iLtoe�+.�x<r.{ <br />Pre3 Oehlert <br />Lloyd Henning <br />Hugh t+larren <br />Brad Cattle <br />John O'Connor <br />IIob Landles <br />`�ra�.�nSPOrd�Ka:icc, 5-2-7� <br />�J33! �3-�6' S,��„ <br />44- � � � -� �� s S :, <br />4as� �-��-�5' A,�:�x1"� <br />a��tq �-3i-�d s.s:, . <br />�as z ���-�Y Pr;,:�l�,»�i <br />4sqA9 sCr—�4-�y ���.��,.�, <br />4 �'17 J �iZ'/i• '�•N�S:IIN(• <br />, _:�, � <br />