Laserfiche WebLink
(h) Deterioration in yround oiater quality, either through Yes M�be No <br />direct injection, or through the seepage of leachates, <br />phosphates, deteryents, riaterborne virus or bacteria, or <br />other substances into the gr�und tiaters? _ _ X <br />(i) Reduction in the amouni of �rdter otherwise available for <br />public water supplies? _ _ X <br />Explanation: II=3�-a/There 4ii11 be no changes in currents or water courses of an� <br />kind as a result of the development of this project. Surface.��ater drainage <br />an� <br />as a <br />. . re�fe <br />. ' II-3 <br />velo <br />nt of entry, rout <br />oint of departure <br />Natural absorptfio <br />fed areas• ho�ieve <br />surface s•rater •�ri <br />d at a controlled <br />There a�i 11 be no <br />nt of this rojec <br />s stem . <br />There t�i be no <br />the development o <br />�ater �,etention sy <br />There aii 11 be no <br />on of storm �•rater <br />There tri 11 be no <br />e that little, if <br />rates tinii �e aitered aue to <br />the rate of surface �iater i• <br />be collected and routed thro <br />ate see above for further e <br />an e in cour5e-or flo�i of fl <br />see above for further er,ola <br />/�rouna t�ater uaiit o <br />urface �rater, 4+i 11 be a <br />/There wil be no reduc <br />es. All ��ater for use <br />s pro�ect �see adove ror Tur <br />ation of surface �rater uali <br />ntion and filtration syCem. <br />ficant effect on the flow of <br />ground �•iater exists at the <br />wi 1 not be affected see ex <br />�ill not be affected as no fo <br />lo��ed to come into contact <br />tion in the amount of taater <br />Ly the project during ronstr <br />reieasea at its na- <br />stal�ation of aved <br />�il not be a iered <br />etention system and <br />ion . <br />ers due to the de-• <br />of storm water de- <br />any ody of rreter <br />explanation of <br />CPP allflVP fllY' PY� <br />excavation an- <br />above . <br />tance, inclu- <br />xisting water <br />for public <br />operations <br />wiii oe su iieo o tne existin cit �aater s stem r�hich, ��e nave oeen assured, <br />has amp e capacity to serve the project �iithout sacrifice to the general public. <br />(4) t�lora. 4lill the proposal result in: <br />(a} Change in tfie diversity of species; or numbers of any Yes Maybe No <br />species of flora (including trees, shrubs, gi-a:�, cro�_, �' • <br />microflora and aquatic plants)? _ X ! <br />(b) Reduction of the numbers of any uniquea rare or endangered <br />species of �lora? X <br />(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or�of a <br />barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X _ _ <br />(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X <br />Explanation: The site is covered 4�ith natural vegetation �ahich is char•acteristi� <br />of this local�ty on land �ihich has been loyged off, cleared, and leveled some tiri <br />a9o, and has been alloued to stand unused. Plurierous sraall everqreen and Alder <br />trees and brusii have develop�d as volunteers on the site. The proiect develonn�^n <br />pl�ns antic�te ret�injng enistip9 treG� aihere pqssible.and removinq ti�e brush <br />