Laserfiche WebLink
• , i�u�ural Res�urces. 41i11 the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No <br />. (.r � — <br />(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? _ _ X <br />(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? _ _,_ X <br />E�x lanati�n: Development of the proposed project ��ill not result in Lhe_depletion <br />of an nonrene�iable resource as its ener source is electric. The lo�dl uwer <br />an ��ater companies have assured us that there are ample supplies availa• e to <br />ser��e the project �•nthout affecting supplies to the qeneral pub �c. <br />(10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposel involve a risk of an explo- <br />sion or th� release of.hazardous substances (including, but <br />not.limited to, oil> pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in <br />the even't of an accident or upset conditions?-� _ — X <br />� �lanation: There t�iil be no risk of explosion or release of. hazardous substances. <br />Existing laws do not allau sucvh occupancies �•nt M n this zone ancl the developer _ <br />' would not acce t such a tenant. <br />(il) Population. .Will the proposal alter the population, distribu- <br />tion, density, or gro�•rth rate of the human population of an , X <br />area? • - •— — — ' <br />Explanation: The proposed project �iill be a corr,nercial development inhahited �y � <br />employees and customers during normal business hours only. It is anticipated <br />� that there will be approximately 130 enployees in the pro�ect uhen it is ful� <br />occupied and approxinatel� 100 customers visiting the site each daY ai, u, �aw��� <br />• will be there at sny one tine <br />(12) Housin . Idill the proposal affect existing housing availabil- <br />ity, or create a demand for additional housing? _ X — <br />Explar:,�ion: Some ne�i employees maY seek housing accomodations in the vicinity of <br />the ro�ect• ho�iever, it is ex ected that most of the tenants of the ro'ect ��rill <br />re ocate from nearby obsolete facilities and their enployees shou d not, there- <br />fore, require ne�� housing in the area We conclude that the effect on existing <br />housing inventories should be minimal. • <br />. (13) Transportation/Circulation. Wil] the proposal result in: <br />(a) Generation ef additional vehicui�r movement? >�_ .._._ _ <br />(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for � <br />ne�a parking? — -- — <br />(c} Zmpact. upon existing t.ransporl:ai.ion systems? ,.^ >; ._ <br />(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement <br />of people and/or go�ds� •�. _ .— X <br />(e) Alterations ta ��aterborne, rail or air traffic? „ ,_, >� <br />(f; Increase in traffic 5azards to motor vehicles, bicyclists <br />or i_^destrians? __- X — <br />