My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005/08/10 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2005
>
2005/08/10 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2017 10:14:08 AM
Creation date
2/15/2017 10:10:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
8/10/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
547
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> lb. Where Compensation Can Occur. Compensation for impacts to vegetated palustrine <br /> wetlands may occur within the same Ecological Management Unit or within the adjacent <br /> Ecological Management Unit (See EMU Map, Figure 2.2 in the 1997 SEWIP). <br /> 2. Minimum Compensation Requirements. The minimum requirements for compensation <br /> will be one acre of restored wetland for one acre of wetland lost. <br /> 3a. How Compensation is Calculated. The acreage of compensation shall be calculated from <br /> the IVA function performance scores using the following ratio, provided that the <br /> minimum compensation requirement of regulation 35.B.2 is met (see 1997 SEWIP Figure <br /> 2.4 for example): <br /> IVA score for per acre function lost X (1.25)X (acres lost)=Acreage of compensation <br /> IVA score for per acre function gained <br /> This regulation applies when the restoration credits are less than the impact debits and the <br /> calculated "Acreage of Compensation"will not be less than the acreage loss; otherwise <br /> regulation 35.B.2 should be applied. The 1.25 multiplier is included in this ratio <br /> calculation to compensate for the temporal loss of wetland functions at the impact site <br /> during the time required for the functions at the compensation site to approach the"pre- <br /> impact" level of performance. <br /> 3b. How Compensation is Calculated When Regulations 35.B. 2 and 9 are Met. In cases <br /> where the performance standards established for"year 5"have been met (see 35.B.9), the <br /> acreage of compensation shall be calculated from the IVA function performance scores <br /> using the following ratio, provided that the minimum compensation requirement of <br /> regulation 35.B.2 is met: <br /> IVA score for per acre function lost X (acres lost) =Acreage of Compensation <br /> IVA score for per acre function gained <br /> This regulation is intended to provide incentive to developers for the creation of large <br /> wetland compensation banks. The 1.25 "temporal"multiplier is not included in this ratio <br /> calculation because the compensation site has demonstrated through monitoring <br /> (Regulation 35.B.9)that wetland functions are performing as proposed in the <br /> compensatory mitigation plan. <br /> 4. Compensation is Based on Limiting Function. Under Regulations 35.B. 3.a and 3b, the <br /> acreage needed for compensation shall be calculated separately for the Water Quality <br /> Improvement and Habitat groups of functions. Whichever group of functions requires <br /> the greater acreage for compensation (i.e. which is the limiting group of functionsi) shall <br /> t The"limiting group of functions"shall be defined as that group of functions(e.g.Water Quality Improvement or Habitat)which <br /> exhibits the least average increase in IVA score per acre for a particular restoration site. <br /> 98 <br /> 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.