My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005/08/10 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2005
>
2005/08/10 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2017 10:14:08 AM
Creation date
2/15/2017 10:10:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
8/10/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
547
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13 <br /> Exhibit 1 <br /> 6.0 IVA acre-points. This is not identified in the SEWIP or Salmon Overlay, but is <br /> an on-going proposal by the Port of Everett. <br /> b. Public lands between the Mukilteo Tank Farm Property and Port of Everett South <br /> Terminal (EMU 7) - Replace existing culverts under the BNSF railroad that limit <br /> transport of sediment and woody debris from the small coastal streams to the beach. <br /> While BNSF owns the right-of-way, access from and/or improvements to adjacent <br /> properties would likely be required. <br /> c. Port of Everett, Kimberly-Clark, and Naval Station Everett: Log raft restrictions <br /> in this area could result in an additional 191.9 IVA-acre gain. (Salmon Overlay <br /> Figure 4.15) <br /> d. Port of Everett Properties on Snohomish River Channel: Naval Station Everett to <br /> 10th Street Boat Launch (EMU 5 partial). Cutting back steep riprapped slopes to a <br /> slope of flatter than 5H:1 V and planting of a saltmarsh bench near the MHHW line <br /> could increase the function by approximately 25 percent, however, the areas where <br /> such changes can be implemented are limited by adjacent land uses. <br /> e. Jetty Island. Creating a full beach profile along the exposed riprap in the southern <br /> portion of the AU could result in an increase of over 2400 IVA acre-points. The <br /> gain in function for salmonids from construction of a second berm is unknown, but <br /> monitoring of the existing berm demonstrated that the gain more than offset the loss <br /> of intertidal beach to the berm. <br /> Description of Individual Restoration/Goals <br /> a. Mukilteo Tank Farm and WSDOT Properties (EMU 7) <br /> (1) Project Description: This shoreline reach includes a part of the former <br /> Mukilteo Tank Farm and tidelands to the east which have been conveyed from <br /> the US Government to WSDOT and is part of EMU 7. This property is the <br /> site of a proposed new Rail/Barge Transfer Facility for which permits are <br /> being sought by the Port of Everett. As part of the planned project, the Port <br /> will conduct an experimental beach restoration project. The restoration will <br /> use in-water fill to restore a more natural beach profile and backshore along <br /> 1,000 feet of shoreline that is currently degraded by riprap at the tank farm, fill <br /> in an existing parking area, and the BNSF railroad fill. A 15- to 30-foot wide <br /> riparian buffer will be planted between the railroad and the intertidal zone. <br /> This project will be closely monitored and will serve as a pilot study for <br /> possible future similar project, along the shoreline from Seattle to Everett. <br /> This restoration action was not identified in the SEWIP documents. <br /> 133 <br /> Section 3 General Goals, Objectives, Policies and Regulations Page 3-63 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.