My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005/08/10 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2005
>
2005/08/10 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2017 10:14:08 AM
Creation date
2/15/2017 10:10:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
8/10/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
547
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit 1 3 <br /> area to uplands in the berm is more than offset by the increased productivity <br /> within the mudflat created inside the berm. <br /> (5) Mechanisms to insure implementation and to measure effectiveness: <br /> Monitoring and adaptive management would be required by permits for <br /> shoreline restoration and/or berm construction. <br /> 2. Private Property <br /> a. Mukilteo Tank Farm to Pigeon Creek No. 1 (EMU 7) <br /> The shoreline reach between the western City limit and the Pigeon Creek No. 1 <br /> delta includes a mix of public and private ownership. BNSF is by far the largest <br /> private landowner and any project in this reach of shoreline would require at least <br /> access through their right-of-way. Numerous private waterfront lots also extend <br /> onto tidelands. The nature of projects that could occur here is fully described under <br /> the Public Property section. Further information based on the Port's project is <br /> necessary to determine whether this approach has broader applicability. <br /> b. East Waterway - Kimberly-Clark. Potential log raft restrictions on Kimberly - <br /> Clark property were discussed in Section E.1.c above. <br /> 3. Regulations in the SMP that Promote Restoration of Shoreline Function. <br /> • Buffers will be restored along the Snohomish River as properties redevelop. The <br /> extent of buffer restoration will depend upon whether uses are water-dependent or <br /> nonwater-dependent. (EMC 19.37) <br /> • Where nonwater-dependent/related commercial and industrial uses are proposed, <br /> environmental restoration is required, when feasible. Existing native shoreline <br /> vegetation must be preserved and enhanced per the requirements of the SMP. (SMP <br /> Regulation 2 on page 5-26, Regulation 1.a. on page 5-31, 32) <br /> • As redevelopment occurs, unnecessary impervious surfaces shall be removed and <br /> shoreline buffers enhanced/restored, except as necessary for access to the water. The <br /> Planning Director can require redesign to minimize impacts to existing vegetation and <br /> to provide for buffer enhancement. (SMP Regulation 11 on page 3-31) <br /> 139 <br /> Section 3 General Goals, Objectives,Policies and Regulations Page 3-69 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.