My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5248
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 5248
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2017 11:37:24 AM
Creation date
2/16/2017 11:36:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Resolution Number
5248
Date
9/25/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 13 <br /> 2005 Alternative 1 (Preferred) Peak Hour Traffic Level of Service <br /> Intersection Location Traffic Control LOS Delay <br /> (secs) <br /> PM Peak Hour(4:30 to 5:30) Conditions <br /> Pacific at Maple Traffic Signal B 18 <br /> Pacific at Broadway Traffic Signal D 37 <br /> Pacific at Lombard Two-way Stop D 28 <br /> Pacific at Oakes Traffic Signal B 15 <br /> Pacific at Rockefeller Traffic Signal B 13 <br /> Pacific at Rucker Traffic Signal D 40 <br /> Wall at Oakes Four-way Stop B 11 <br /> Hewitt at Maple Traffic Signal B 13 <br /> Hewitt at Broadway Traffic Signal D 53 <br /> Hewitt at Rucker Traffic Signal C 25 <br /> Garage Entrance on Oakes Two-way Stop B 12 <br /> AM Peak Hour (7:30 to 8:30) Conditions <br /> Pacific at Oakes Traffic Signal C 21 <br /> Pacific at Rockefeller Traffic Signal A 9 <br /> Garage Entrance on Oakes Two-way Stop B 11 <br /> 8.5 Traffic Conditions for Development Alternative 2 <br /> Existing(2001)traffic volumes were increased as previously described to reflect growth <br /> in background traffic and adjusted to reflect the closure of Lombard Avenue. <br /> The 2005 County Campus Traffic Generation calculated in Table 11 was then distributed <br /> to the existing 500 space County parking garage and the new 800 space County parking <br /> garage described in Section 7.3. The resulting 2005 Alternative 2 traffic volumes for the <br /> ten intersections are provided in Appendix A and the local turning movements are <br /> illustrated on Figures 11 and 12 for the AM and PM Peak Hours respectively. <br /> Level of service analyses were also completed for the 2005 Alternative 2 as shown on <br /> Table 14. These analyses indicate that there are minor deviations of the level of service <br /> at a few intersections compared to the No-Build and Alternative 1 (Preferred) conditions. <br /> However, all of the levels of service are at LOS D or better which again is within <br /> acceptable limits for peak hour traffic. <br /> CRI Transportation Impact Analysis Page 32 June 2002 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.