Laserfiche WebLink
WHEREAS, given this growing level of traffic backup—particularly in Everett, Snohomish <br /> County,the Puget Sound region as a whole,and the state overall—a significant commitment to <br /> capital investment by the state is clearly necessary; and <br /> WHEREAS,the need for state investment was borne out by the two-year review of a Blue <br /> Ribbon Commission on Transportation,that identified between$50 billion and $150 billion in <br /> unfunded transportation needs in the State of Washington that cannot be addressed without new <br /> state revenue; and <br /> WHEREAS,desjpite the growing capital needs, state revenues for transportation have either <br /> remained stagnant or in some cases decreased, as illustrated by a state gas tax that has stayed at <br /> 23 cents for more than a decade and a Motor Vehicle Excise Tax(MVET)that was reduced by <br /> $750 million a year by recent voter-approved initiatives;and <br /> WHEREAS,Everett partnered in 2002 with Snohomish County,the private-sector Snohomish <br /> County Committee for Improved Transportation(SCCIT),The Boeing Co.,other business <br /> organizations, labor groups,environmental groups,other governmental agencies, and interested <br /> citizens, in urging the Legislature to take bold action to tackle the transportation crisis in the <br /> Puget Sound region and across the state; and <br /> WHEREAS,Everett requested any state transportation package include project funding for the <br /> following: I-5 HOV lane improvements,I-5 auxiliary lanes between 41s`St and SR 2, and I- <br /> 5/41S` Street interchange upgrades;Bothell-Everett Highway improvements between 112th and <br /> 132nd streets; freight mobility enhancements to the 41s`Overcrossing/Lowell Neighborhood <br /> Bypass and East Marine View Drive projects; commuter rail track improvements between Seattle <br /> and Everett; assistance for transit; State Route 96(1286/132"d Street) improvements in <br /> Snohomish County just outside of Everett; and programmatic funding for a)cities and counties to <br /> receive a local share of new gas tax revenue;b)the Transportation Improvement Board; and c) <br /> the Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board;and <br /> WHEREAS,Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 6347,the transportation budget and investment <br /> package passed by the Legislature and placed on the November 5 general election ballot as <br /> Referendum Bill No. 51, includes funding for all of the aforementioned Everett and Snohomish <br /> County project and program priorities; and <br /> WHEREAS,Referendum Bill No. 51 further contains efficiencies, reforms, and accountability <br /> measures, in an effort to respond to the public's legitimate concern that taxpayer money should be <br /> wisely spent,tracked, and responsibly measured over time for results; and <br /> WHEREAS,Referendum Bill No. 51 is largely financed through user fees,meaning those who <br /> drive cars and trucks on the system, and those who buy new or used automobiles that add to the <br /> number of vehicles on our roads and highways,are the ones who pay for the improvements <br /> through gas taxes,a gross-weight fee on trucks and large vehicles,and an auto sales tax <br /> surcharge; and <br /> WHEREAS,the Referendum Bill No. 51 is a$7.8 billion down-payment on traffic congestion <br /> problems, bottlenecks, and transportation infrastructure that is more expensive to our region NOT <br /> to make than it is to go ahead with its implementation. <br /> 2 <br />