Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> �I That the City of Everett, and particularly its Buildinq and <br /> 1 <br /> Inspection Department, was at all times aware of applicant' s <br /> 2 <br /> intended use oi the property as a duplex, and the City at no time <br /> 3 <br /> � objected to applicant' s i;itentions; but, to the contrar_t, either <br /> 5 approved or consented to applicant' s intended use of the property. <br /> For the above reasons, applicant respectfully requests that <br /> 6 <br /> 7 the Board favorably reconsider its earlier decision of September <br /> 8 10, 1973, and grant the requested variance cr, in the alternative, <br /> p set the matter far a re-hearing so that the above evidence and <br /> 10 any additiona.l evidence can properly be--g esente- to the Board. <br /> DATED this 16th day of November;1973 . �_` <br /> 11 / �G-�� Ge�e"" _ <br /> ` Rddolf . Mueller <br /> 12 of Muellar and Chapman <br /> Attorneys for Applicant <br /> l�` 2510 Colby Avenue <br /> 14'� Everett, Washington 98201 <br /> 259-5541 <br /> 15 I� <br /> 16 ; STATE OF WASHINGTON ) <br /> ) ss. <br /> 17I,ICounty of Snohomish ) <br /> 18ii g_ IVAR HALE, of Hale Construction Company,being first <br /> 19lduly sworn on oath, deposes and says: <br /> 20l That Hale Construction Cor�zpany is the petitioner in the <br /> I above-entitled matter, and that he has read the foregoiny Petition <br /> 211for Rer.onsideration and/or Re-Hearing, knows the contents thereof <br /> land believes the same to be true. <br /> 22 � � J��-�� <br /> � <br /> 23I B. ivar�le' <br /> 74 SUBSCRIBED AND SOWRtd to before me tl�is /� day of Noven�ber, 1973. <br /> 25 ' ��-;yx-c"I- 'i -i GGr�c�--_ <br /> �� Notary hlic in and for the <br /> 26 State�z Washing��, residing <br /> at �-lcr.uak.� ,.<-c� <br /> 27 <br /> 28 <br /> 29 <br /> 30 � <br /> 31I <br /> 32 PETITION <br /> MUELLER nNo CHAPMAN <br /> ATTOpNEY9 AT LAW <br /> 2510 COLOY AVENYE <br /> EVEPETi. WA9NINGTON 9B201 <br /> 259-5.'i41 <br /> li <br />