Laserfiche WebLink
. • � , <br /> witho:�t any openings is required for ffie walls on the north <br /> and sou�h sides of the building. <br /> b. Conclusions: Based upon compliance with building codes, <br /> specifically the provision f�: one hour fue resistive walls on <br /> the north and south sidc•s of the ne�� gazage, the proposed <br /> variance is not anticipated to have a detrimental impact on <br /> the adiacent propert;es or the city. <br /> Criterion No. 3: <br /> That the variance will only grant the subject propetty the same general <br /> rights enjoyed by other property in the same azea and zone as the subject <br /> property. <br /> a. Findin s: The surrounding area is developed with mix of <br /> land uses but mainly single family residences with associated <br /> outbuildings. The majority of these residences were <br /> constructed prior to 1956. Many of the outbuildings for <br /> these residences are detached garages located along the alley <br /> and were constructed about the same time as the residences. <br /> A sampling of the immediate azea shows numerous garages <br /> and other structures that aze located less than five feet from <br /> the side property lines and cover more than 50% of the <br /> required rear yard area. (See Exhibit Nl) <br /> b. Conclusions: The surrounding area is developed with many <br /> detached accessory structures that do not meet the minimum <br /> required setbacks and exceed the required rear yard coverage <br /> allowance. The reduced setback and building size proposed <br /> by the applicant would not grant the subject property <br /> additional rights not enjoyed by other properties in the area. <br /> Criterion No. 4: <br /> That the �ariance is the minimum necessary to allow ihe subject property <br /> the generalrights described in Criterion 3. <br /> a. Findin s: See Criteria #3. <br /> b. Conclusions: See Criteria J/3 <br /> Criterion No. 5: <br /> The granting of the variance is consistent with the goais and policies of <br /> the Everett General Plan. <br /> a. Findin s: The Everett General Plan designatc:s this property <br /> as 1.7 Multip(e Family Betached. <br /> b. Conclusions: The proposed use of the subject property for <br /> resident�al purposes is consistent with the E'sverett General <br /> Plan. <br /> Criterion No. 6: <br />