My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3322 LOMBARD AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
LOMBARD AVE
>
3322
>
3322 LOMBARD AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2022 1:52:15 PM
Creation date
2/17/2017 8:22:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
LOMBARD AVE
Street Number
3322
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- . �. <br /> io: Allen Gif-Fen <br /> From: Dave Davi= <br /> Date: November �_ , 1988 <br /> Subject: F'ar4;iny requirements <br /> As I have previously discussed t•iith you I have serious reser- <br /> vations ovei- the propesed par4�in� requirements for the one <br /> bedroom ef�Ficiency apartments (b���� sq. ft. ) in the proposed <br /> parkiny e;;empt zone. I feel that etficiency ap,�rtments in <br /> close pro;;imicy to the homeport will attract naval personnel , <br /> and adequate par4;ina shnuld be provided for them. <br /> I 've called thi-ee Naval communities to see what parl:ing re- <br /> quirements the local �uri�dictions require. <br /> 1 . Mayport Naval Station; Atlantic Beach, Florida <br /> 2 stalls per dwelliny, multiple family and single famil/ <br /> 2. Al�meda Naval Station; Alameda, California <br /> 1 . 5 si:al.ls for a one bedroom efficienc/ ��t. . 1.�5 stalls <br /> fer 1 °< 2 bedroom apt. <br /> _ . San Diego, California <br /> 1. � stalls for a one bedroom apartment. 1 . 6 s+�lls for a � <br /> bedroom apt. <br /> 'ihe traffic division conducted a parfting study of ttvo effi- <br /> ciency apts. (�:27 Hoyt. 4^<•:?�7 Hoyt) in October, 1987. The <br /> managers of the comple;:es were contacted to find out the num- <br /> ber of vehicles owned per unit. Of the ��2 i�nits between the <br /> two comple�es, :"1 vehicles were owned and parS:ed on site. Re- <br /> member that parking requirements should also include parl;ing <br /> for visitors, and delivers. <br /> I understand the effort to reduce the par4:i.ng requirement in <br /> hopes of pramoting development, 6ut no less than 1 parkiny <br />� stall per unit should be provided on site, and 1. LJ " S .rJ <br /> stalls provided per unit. On street par�11=1 par4r.iny could be <br /> chan�ed to angle par4;ing to provide the additional par4:in� <br /> needed for visitors and deliveries. A parF:iny fund could he <br /> create whereby a developer a�ould contribute monies a�nich the <br /> Ci.ty would in turn use to construct angle parkiny in the gen- <br /> eral vicinity, Chan�ing parallel par4;ing to anqle par4;ing <br /> cost appror,i.mately $15uU per stalls. The developer a�ould need <br /> to contrihute bet�•ieen 537J - �7JC) dollars pei- unit to ma4;e up <br /> for the visitor and d�livery par4::ing he is not providiny on <br /> site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.