5921 LOMBARD AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

� .-. ,-- BOARD OF AD.TUSTMENT FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDF.R (Variance 1133-84) li Based upon the written request for a variance from the City's zoning,, ' code, specifically 19.14.050 (B) , made by Harvey Rossiter I �' I at 5921 Lombard , hereinafter referred to as "Applicant," the Board of�i � Adjustment, following a public hearing on said application he2d on Nov. 5 ,� ' 1984, and further having reviewed all testimony, makes the following Findings,l '' Conclusions, and Order: I i ' I '�I E:chibiCs: I ! 1. Staff Report i 2. Vicinity Map ii 3. Plat Map 3. Narrative Statement I i�I FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. That there have been exceptional or extraordinary circ�mstances ox conditione applying to the sut�ject property or as to the intended use thereof that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity or zone. 2 i 3 u Finding: The applicant owns a parcel of property at 5921 Lombard Ave.i The property is 60 feet x 150 feet and has an existing single fanily� residence, garage and workshop with 11 foot 8 inches x 21 foot slab.� The applicar.t wishes to build u fiber glass canopy over the slab to� function as a carport. i �onclubion: The carport would be four feet from the side property linel against a tall hedge and several txees. i That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of al substantial property right of the appellant possessed by the owners ofl other properties in the same vicinity or zone. Finding: The applicant's property is located in the R-1 zone and isl, being used per that requirement. ' Conclusion: To util:tze the existing s1ab, the appli��ant would need al two foot variance. ! That the authorizaY.ion of such variance will noc be materially'� detrimental Co the public welfare or injurious to property in the� vicinity or zone in mhich the property is located. � Finding: The variance request is on the south property line aajb^ent! to a 6 foot hedge. Conclusion: Because of the existing screening and the general� location, tliis variance will not be materially detrimental to thei public.