My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6407 LOMBARD AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
LOMBARD AVE
>
6407
>
6407 LOMBARD AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2017 8:39:37 AM
Creation date
2/17/2017 8:57:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
LOMBARD AVE
Street Number
6407
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'i'lie gr<�.nti.,zg c,`: t.lic var.i.ancn <br />atfect the Comprchensive La;id <br />�ri.l1 not adversely <br />Use Plan. <br />f Mr David Brandvold, <br />� <br />A hearin9 was held on the applicatzon o . <br />4926-27i:h Avenue, Sverett for a variance from Section 15.04.075 <br />L'.C.C. (Zoning Ordinar.ce) R-S, Subur.ban Residential 7one for <br />permission to segregate �our (�) lots into ei�l.to£$landildThreeites <br />�aith each site to have more thu�t 12,500 sq. <br />(3) parcels to have lessrthan fl0 iti•a°cels�toabe servedubyla <br />dedicated stieet.' Four ,4) (rear) P <br />proposed sixteen (1�) foot easement (driveway).: <br />Lots 8, 9, 10, and 11 Darlington Replat Let 'X'. <br />Also for g�r���='�ion to segregate one Par��Toximately 12t160��sq(Zft. <br />bailding �ztes'. Each site to contain apl <br />o� land area as oNpoGecl to the minimum o�: 12,500 sq. ft. as <br />required by Ordinance No. 3572. Eacii pa�:cel to h<ve more than <br />the minimum of f0 ft. oi rrontage on a p'�lblic dedicated street. <br />L'ot 26, Darlington Re�lat i,ot 'X'. <br />Dir. Brandv��ld a6ded .to his application b�� sayi.ng tLat because of <br />present co:'Cs ar.d iuture �xpanditures mo:_e lots tacre needed to <br />make the de'oelurment economically feasib.Le. <br />There were no further remarks from the ai:dience either for or <br />against r1r. IIrandvold's application. <br />� i.7r. Shockey asY,ed why this had not been :-eplatted instead of a <br />variance requested. DIr. IIrandvold.�responded that �his would have <br />been time consuning and expensive. <br />After visually viewing the subject property and considering all <br />the facts it taas moved by Mr. Ingram, seconded by Mr. Champion <br />and unanimously carried to postpone a decision on b;r. Brandvold's <br />request until the next regular Board of- Adjustment hearing in <br />Oct-ober 1:7?. This o;ill allow more time for research and study b� <br />both the Hoard and 'che applicant. It was suggested that Mr. <br />Narshalllcsconsult��dnregarding the lGafoothroadsnd that the Fire <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.