6932 LOWER RIDGE RD 2016-01-01 MF Import

.'� ,�'�" ,S�) �u. ._� MAX 2, 1�77 The regular meeting of the �verett Board of Adjustment o�as held at 7:30 p.m. in the City Iiall Conference Room, City Hall, Everett, �4ashington. t•ir. Baird presided; tdr. Kristiansen, b7r. Russell, Mr. Blac);, and Mr. Berg �vere present. A portion of the minutes fr.om t..� Aoril �977 meeting pertaining to David Br.andvold was read and aoproved. The minutes stated idr. Brandvold c.ould reanply to the Eoard if he so desired. His ap- plicati.on is the.first to be heard at this May liearing. A hearing �vas held on the application of David Brandvold, P.O. Box 423, Mukilteo, k*-,shingL-on for a variance f.rom Section 19.08.010 E.D1.C. (L•'verett bSunicipal Code) Land Use, Paragraph B, for rermis- sion to abut thirty (30) feet on a pub].ic dedicated street r.ather than the code requirement oi forty (40) ieet. L�Ge�L D�SCRIPTION: ' Tract 35, Beverly Acreage Tracts except the north sixty-sir. (6G) feet thereof. Also, er.cept the south ninety-five (95) feet of L-he east eighty- � five ([i5) feet of said Lot 35. i � AD�RESS: , Approximately 7000 Locver iticlge Road Zoning: R-2 Sin91e I'amily High Density Residence 'e Mr. IIrandvold represented himself and stated that there will be � t�ao (2) separate twenty (20) ioot drivei��ays with a six (6) foo� ; separation between th� tt•ro (2) drivec•rays. Also, i:here is no other access to the property other than the d�.iveways that are proposed. There �tias no opposition from the audience. Afte�- visually viewing the subject nrcperty ana considering all the facts, it was noved by D4r. Russell, seconded by rir. Kristiansen, and unanimously carried to grant the appl:�cant's request for the following reasons: 1. There is very limited access to a larqe tract of land so such a variance is necessary for the enjoyment of a substantial proper.ty right of the appellant- possesscfl Uy the owners of other properties in the same vici�iity. 2. 13ecause of. the teriain, the nacl: portion of the loi: would probably never Ue developed ii the variance was noL- granted. 3. Tl�ere ar.e e�;ceptional circumstances applying to t11e subject property as to ihe intended use, that do not apply generally to ot}ier properties in L-lie same vicini.ty.