Laserfiche WebLink
4.0 SUBS�JRFACE INVESTIGATION <br />41 DRILLING <br />On August 8 and 19, 1991 seven soil borings (B-1, B-2, B-3, SB-d, SB-5, VW-1 and VW-2) were <br />drilled and sampled at the locations shown on Figure 2 Frve of the borings were drilled with truck- <br />mounted drilGng equipment using 8-inch outside-diameter (OD) hollow-stem augers. Boring SB� <br />and SB-5 were drilled with a custom-built drill rig also equipped with 8-inch OD hollow stem augecs. <br />Ti�ic rig was ut�:+:d due to restricted :.ccess lunitations. All of t6e borings were drilled by McGarrett <br />Drilling of Bellewe, Washington. Prior to each boring, the auger was steam-cleaned in order to <br />prevent cross contamination between borings. ASEACOR geologist observed the drilGng and logged <br />t6e borings. Soils were visually classified in acoordance with the Uni£ed Soil Classification System <br />(LTS(S). Boring logs are presented in Append'uc A <br />A two-inch inside-diameter split spoon sampter was driven by a 140-pound wire-line hammer at <br />app*mdmately frn-foot intecvals to collect soil zamples. Before each use, the sampler was cleaned <br />in an aqueous solution of Iiqui-Noz cleaaser, rinsed with tap water, and rinsed a second time with <br />distilled, de'_ooized water. 'Ibis rigorous cleaning procedure was followed in order to prevent cross <br />contamination between sample intecvals. Soil cuttings &om the bodngs were placed on plastic in a <br />stcekpile located near the west side of the building. <br />Soilc encountered during the drilling activides were predominantly composed of brown gray saAds <br />with gravel and cobbles. The very dense soils lacked signi6cant ocganics and were dry to moisL <br />Groundwater was not encountered during drilling in any of the borings. <br />From the drive samples, soil samples were colixted for c6emicr.l analysis by transferring soil to <br />sampl.e containecs using a clean stainless steel scoop. The scoop was cleaned pri�r to the traasfer <br />of each sampk using the same procedures as that for the split spoon sarapler. The sample container <br />from esch sample interval was sealed with Te4on-lined screw caps, labeled, wrapped with tape, and <br />immediately placed in a 5eid cooler with ice. Remaining soil was checked for hydrocarbon odo[s <br />and monitored for wlatile organic vapots using a photoionization detector (PID). The PID was <br />equipped' with a 10.2 electron-volt lamp and calbrated,in the field with isobutylene (a benzene <br />equivalent standard gas). PID readiags ate tecorded on the boring logs in Appendiz A <br />4.2 VADOSE ZONE WELL INSTALLATION <br />Upon compleiion, two borings (VW-1 and VW-2) were wnverted to monitoring welLs. Each well <br />was completed using two-inch-diameter, flush-threaded, Schedule 40 PVC, slotted (0.010-inch slots) <br />and blank casing. Tt�e bottom of the casing was sealed with a solid PVC cap, and the top was <br />covered with locldng plug-type cap. <br />The annular space between borehole wal: and casing was bac�lled with clean filter sand from the <br />bottom of the borehole to appro�dmately 2 feet above the slotted interval, and a 2-foot-thick <br />bentonite seal was placed above the gravel pack. The temainder of the annulus was filled with a <br />bentonite-cement grout to a point just below the ground surface. <br />M.ua�.arrn <br />n�� tz �„i 4-1 <br />