Laserfiche WebLink
Geotcchnicnl Enginecring Evnluntion <br />1:,03 Mndronn Ave - King <br />Decembcr 2, 2006 <br />R�II Pile I�'o. 39?OG <br />Page 9 <br />against the front of lhe footing. �Vc recommend th�t tLe uppu foot uf'soil be neglected when cniculating <br />thc passive resistanca The soil surfacc should bc horizomal in front of the tboting f'or a distance equal to <br />nt Icust threc times the depth o1 embcdment of the f�oting. <br />Sl��bs-On-Grade <br />��Inh_on-grade areas sliould be prepared as rccommcnded in the Site Preparation And Grading <br />sub3ection of lhis report. Alicr removal of loose soil, Oie subgrade should be compncted to a dense, non- <br />yielding condition. Prior to structural fill placcmcnt, thc subgrnde should be proofrolled with u henvy, <br />rubber-ti•ed piecc of eyuipment, �o idcntify soR or yielding urcus that requiro rcpair. Arcas obscrvcd to <br />pump or weave shouid bc reworkcd to strucuinl fill specifications cr be eacavated nnd replaced with <br />properly compactcd structural fill. <br />�Ve recommend that nll (loor slabs be underinin by ut least G inches of free-dr.+ining sand or gravel 1'or <br />u;e as a capillary brenk. A suitable vapor barcicr, such ns hcavy pinstic shceting (10-mil minimum is <br />rocommendcd), should be pinced over tlie sand or gravel. A 4-inch-thick c�vshcd rock blanket may be <br />❑sed lo cover lhe vnpor bnrricr to profect it. 9'he capillary break should be designed to drain in[o [hc <br />Coundation drain systcm, <br />Lxtcr:il Pressures on Subsurfacc and Rctaining �Valls <br />7'hc lateral pressure acting on suhswfacc and retnining wnlls is dcpcndcnt on the nnuirc and dcnsity ot <br />the soil bchind the wnll, thc nmotmt of lateral wall movement which cnn occur as blchtill is pinccd, wnll <br />drainage conditions, nnd the inclination of tl�e backfill. Por walls that are free to yicld nt the top nt leust <br />onc thous:indth of the height of the wall (active condition), snil pressures will be Icss than if movemeot is <br />limitcd by such Cactors as wall stiffness or bracing (nt-rest condition). We recommend that wnlls <br />supporting hori�.ontal bnckfill nnd no! _�.ibjected to hydrostatic forccs be dcsigned using a triangular earth <br />pressure dislribution cquivnlent to that excrted by a fluid with a dcnsity of 35 pcf for yiclding (active <br />condition) walls, and 60 pcf for non-yiclding (nt-rest condition) walls. <br />l�hcsc recommcnded lateial earth pressures nre based on the assumption of a horizontal ground surfncc <br />adjvicent to the wall for a distancc of at lenst the subsurface height of Uie wnll, and do not nccount for <br />surcharges. Additional Intcral carth pressures should be considered for surcharge londs ncting ad,jacent to <br />RM! ASSOCIATES LLC <br />li'd GST9-6z9 (03E] s�oaliyo�d �N su�csaQ dLS�EO LD 60 JeW <br />