Laserfiche WebLink
Geotechn�cal Engineering F�pert <br />1313 Madrona Avenue <br />Everett, Washi�igton <br />�vtarch 11, 2013 <br />RN File No. 2793-OOtA <br />Page 5 <br />Seismic Hazard: It is our opm�on bzsed on our subsurface explorations Ihat the Soil Profde m <br />accordance with the 2009 and 2012 International Bwlding Code (IBC) is Site Class C wrth <br />Seismic Design Category D. We us�d the US Geological Survey program "U.S. Seismic Design <br />Ivlaps V1'eb Applic2tion." The design maps summary reports for the 20G9 and 2012 IBC are <br />included m Ihis report as Appendix A. <br />Additionat seismic considerations include liquefaction poteniial and ampllfication of ground <br />motions by soft soil deposits. The liquefaction potantial is highest for loose sand with a high <br />groundwater table The underlying dense glacial drift and adeance outwash soils are <br />considered to have a very low potenual for liquefaction and ampli(ication of ground motion. <br />Site Preparation and Grading <br />The (�rst step of srte preparation should be to strip the vegetation, topsoil, or loose soils to <br />expose medwm dense or fumer natrve soils in pavement and bwlding areas. The excavated <br />matenal should be removed from the site, or stockpiled for later use as landscaping (ill The <br />resulting subarade shou:d be compact�d to a iirm, non-y�elding condition. Areas observed to <br />pump or yield should be repaired prior to placing hard surfaces. <br />The on-site glacial drift likely to be exposed during consiruction is considered highly moisture <br />sensitive, and the surface will disturb easily when wet �Ne expect these soils would be <br />difficult, if not impossible, to compact to structural (ill specifications in wet weather. We <br />recommend that earthwork be conducted during the drier months. Additional expenses of �vet <br />weather or winter construction could include extra excavation and use of imported fill or roch <br />spalis. During wet weather, alternative site preparation methods may be ne�essary. These <br />methods may include utihzing a smooth-bucket trackhoe to complete site stripping and <br />diverting construction Iraffic around prepared subgrades. Disturbance to the prepared <br />suhgrade may �e mmimrzed 6y placing a blanket of reck spails or imported sand and gravel in <br />traf(ic and roadway areas Curoii drains or ditches can also be helpful in reducing gradiny costs <br />during the wet season. These methods can be evaluated at the t�me of consUuction. <br />Structural Fill <br />General: All fdl placed beneath buildmgs, pavements or other setdement sensitive features <br />should be placed as structural (ill. Siruclural (ill, by dehni�ion, is placed in accordance wi�h <br />prescribed methods and standards, and �s observed by an experienced geotechnical <br />professional or soils technician. Field observauon procedures would include the per(onnance <br />of a representauve number of implace densiry tests to document the atta�nment ci the desired <br />degree of relative compacuon. <br />Materials: Imported structural fill should consist of a good quality, free•draining granular soil, <br />free of organics and otiier deletenous material, and be well graded to a maximum size o( about <br />3 inches. Imported, all-weather structural fill should contain no more than 5 perceni fines (soil <br />finer than a Standard U.S. No. 200 sieve�, based on that iracUon passing ihe U.S 3/4-inch sieve. <br />The use of on-site soil as structural fill will be dependent on moi,ture content control. Some <br />drymg of the native soils may be necessary in order to achieve compaction. During warm, <br />sunny days this could be accomplished by spreading the matenal in thin Irfts and compaciing. <br />Rabinson Noble, Inc <br />