Laserfiche WebLink
. <br /> s <br /> ��� <br /> r2 Il i;`� �� �� <br /> ir. _i ._ �t . <br /> I �p � � f � <br /> �t�L�2 � 1�� , <br /> ,:11'Y OF ��RETl <br /> Clty�C���G� APPEAL BRIEF <br /> Appellant, Paul and Audrey Yerger, by and through their <br /> attorney, Scott Bader, request the City Council reverse or remand <br /> the decision of the hearing examiner. (Decision entered June 19 , <br /> 1992; Request for Reconsideration denied July 13�, 1992 ) . <br /> A BRIEF STATEMENT DELINEATING iHE FINDING <br /> The appellants are requii'ed to put in 'half-street <br /> improvements ' pursuant to FMC 18 . 04 . 1U0 under the authority of RCW <br /> 58 . 1.7 .060 and RCW 58 . 17 . 010. <br /> The basis for this requirement. is the Planning Department ' s <br /> contention that the subject property does have the ootential to be <br /> developed into more than fc , - lots . <br /> 3RIEF STATEMENT AS TO HOW THE APPEAI,I.ANT <br /> • IS AGGRIEVED BY THE DECISZON <br /> Appeallant is aggrieved by the Hearing Examiner' s decision in <br /> that despite the fact the Planning Department was unable to prove <br /> there was the potential for development of the property into a�ore <br /> than four lots with easeemtns or variances (none of which the <br /> appellants we:e guaranteed to obtain) , the appeallants are required <br /> to put in half street improvements on their property. <br /> • 55 <br /> APPERL BRIEF - 1 <br />