Laserfiche WebLink
.. V .t-\ - " � � � . _ - _ _ <br /> � C�. QL� (i "� � ,� <br /> ul.l v:,; - 1992 �---, <br /> REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATIONIITY OF _ :' .;I-TT <br /> FI?�,� „: .� <br /> Appellant, Paul and Audrey Yerger, by and through their <br /> attorney, Scott Bader, request the Hearing Examiner reconsider his <br /> decision entered in this matter on June 19, 1992 . <br /> , The alleged errors consist of ( 1) Hearing Examiner' s decision <br /> that there are facts which support half street imnrovements under <br /> RCW 58. 17 . 110; and (2) that �he word potential was improperly <br /> defined and that under a correct definition and understanding of <br /> the term 'potential ' no potential exists for development of more <br /> than three lots, or four or five lots with an easement. <br /> The City asserted that RCW 58. 17 . 110 provided some support for <br /> half street improvement. While the City provided the Hearing <br /> Examiner with an assertion by the City Eng�neer that Holly Drive <br /> and Fourth Place SE are used by students walking to schools in the <br /> area, they provided no evidence that students heading to and from <br /> these schools ac�ually walk adjacent to the Yerger property. The <br /> City did not provide any evidence tha� the proposed sidewalks would <br /> actually be used by students heading to and from these schools or <br /> that. �he sidewalks would assure safe walking conditions for <br /> students who walk to and from school . <br /> Ev�en under the 'webster' s ' definition of potential, the City <br /> did not: demonstrate that the division of the property into the <br /> REOUEST FOR qECONSlJER�TION - 'I <br /> L� �� � V <br />