Laserfiche WebLink
��. ! . 4��g�� ��u� : �'Myi��pl{drtiy�(��!S`A�! �rr�. � +.:La���qM�l�"^'ll.Y��� -' ��'1:.. <br /> :��.0� ., �tl11R�'j$Ys...,L . - .��'�F�@���itj �'p�l-,. _�F�-- - - ,I =..AT�1���b ��'' .t '.�"'�"ro" � ..,.:�'�. <br /> ' x �_ : '__F"�2 � .._ � + � ^' - <br /> � <br /> 8 Re�ding the publlc safety issue, xe fealeal he�; re �at1y <br /> distorted. No mention xas m�de at the apP �-T1� <br /> tr.a££i� hazards tha.t xould te crea'ted by a 4 0� 5 'lot development. <br /> I£, for example, a 5 lot deveiopment xas p�nned, the easem�nt roNi <br /> reauired xould be in line xith the GTE eatry and exit drive. This <br /> xould olearly create a hazaz'd to pedestrian as xe11 as vehiculz.: t=afiic. <br /> With the 3 lot division xe plan, the Holly Dr. Zot #1 xoald not cz��ate <br /> a tra£f ic problem, nor xould I�ot #3 on 4th P1. S.E. <br /> We, as residents in this area are uell axare of local tra.f£ic n�tterns <br /> azui xe gr�posed our short-subdivision xith evezy intent to insure <br /> publi.: safety. We aLso desired to create lots aypealing to family <br /> livir.g at a reasonable cost. If, as tne city pr�ip�sed IAt #2 is <br /> divided (removing the garage and carport�, 2 addit�.onal lots could be <br /> created at a great cost, xhich xoulti only add to the alrear.�y in£lated <br /> groperty grices ?n tne Everett area. Lt is very exnensive to move <br /> buildings and xe aze curio� i:o Imou where it says "potential develop- <br /> ment" mPans removing good tuildings. : <br /> We have lived on our �operty £or cv�r 30 years and had hoped to <br /> develop our land to grovide for our old age. Nox, xe £ind due to <br /> tureaucratic intergreta.tion of a code xe aze denied the right <br /> to develop our property into three lots urless xe make extensive <br /> and expensive street imjsovements. <br /> IN gUh4SA.RY: At the start tr' �ere concerned about street izrlsove�:eats <br /> and made a snecial e£fort to find out i£ street imgrovements xould be <br /> required £or a 3 lot short-subdivision. The irtformation xe received <br /> led us to trlieve xe xould not need to ma.Ise street imgrovements xith <br /> a 3 lot shoit-subdivision. Based on that in£ornation cre invested tim� <br /> and money (almost 3 1�2 thoi:sand to date� for the short-sut3ivision, � � <br /> only to rinrl xe are dealing xith a cagrinious tureauracy. Txo years 't <br /> ago xe had a buyer xho xa.nted to divide this groperty into S lots and �`" %� <br /> the City of Everett xould not apgrove. Never once did xe dream that <br /> the City of Everett �rould be looking for more lots £rom our development <br /> plans srhen �Seviously it had refused to consi3er a 5 loi division. <br /> We have tried jn every legal sray to comply xith the City of Everett <br /> rogarding this short-subdivision. <br /> We £eel :� �st continue to appeal a � to the fact that pertinent <br /> in£ormatio�. tras not forthcomi� from che City ef �verett re�arding <br /> street impro �ements (laased on potential develcpment) xhen xe initially <br /> iru;uired requesting in£orraation rega._'din8 street imgrovements. • i <br /> Sir.cere7,y, ` <br /> pa.�.�/°` ��l-�-�-�i'-�''-- ; k <br /> / <br /> Mr, & Mrs. Paul Yerger , ` <br /> �Y� � <br /> . ` �� <br /> AY <br /> ,' (�j 8 <br /> I',t)� � <br /> ' � <br /> I � <br /> ',',;�;;:�' <br /> ! ',;;�� <br /> ,,;^,,' <br /> "•:h a <br /> �l� <br /> �'��. <br /> ,,� <br /> i1(` <br /> ` 4 .xi���.�u � �}A K 4 j� e;'u y `"i�� <br /> � � � ��`��� � ��.: � "^�.� _ ,� �' 'FI�. �t��.� �� �11. . `�ti� � ` p�)! <br /> 4 hT^Si ^ 1 � 1 ��� L 7.: t�^a- •L: � `a�� � � �41 <br /> Y `4M41 . �+ »:s,d„�• �:•.'.,.�. . � r r, . +.�'�...."'�'�'v a'dY,1.� �..r.. ..a � <br /> � <br /> �._� .�.:.. �'`�� _ y:. .� __� .._.� _ _..��� �a__.��`���'�� . ��."���„�--- � <br />