Laserfiche WebLink
d � � <br /> accusations opens the city to great liability. It is r.ot my <br /> purpose to fight with the city. All I want or evez wanted <br /> was to get the place taken caze of at a pace which would not <br /> break my family. There was no reason, other than the <br /> building not looking terrific, for the work ta be required Eo <br /> be done on a time schedule other than my own. The building <br /> was livable and had both water and electricity (and heat) and <br /> had no leaks ot broken windows. It had been occupied on and <br /> off over the last several years and continuously prior to <br /> that (before we started to improve it) . The siding that is <br /> "falling off" in youi employee' s words, was removed in even <br /> strips around the building to provide access for blowing in <br /> the insulation in the complete insuiation/weatherization job <br /> we did. It included all new insulated glass throughout the <br /> stcucture. Both of these imptovements are readily appacent <br /> to the naked eye of any layperson even from the street. It <br /> is quite easy to tell that windows are not and have not ever <br /> been bioken since their replacement with the new insulated <br /> glass, long before the written accusation of "broken windows" <br /> was made. It is truly a sign of incompetence, ignoring <br /> facts, or pure and blatant abuse of authority when a <br /> "professional" in the field of inspecting buildings cannot or <br /> will not recognize facts or chooses to ignor.e them in favor <br /> of bullying the taxpayers of this city. This person ' s <br /> actions have cost my family ovet $700 per month in zent and <br /> slowed the pzocess of improvement very significantly. It has <br /> also cost us substantial amounts to get inspections done by <br /> professional people to confirm what we already kne� and what <br /> was apparent to your employee, too, despite her lies. <br /> All that having beer; said, I still believe in doing things <br /> zight. As previously stated, I nevez had any intention of <br /> NOT doing thir,gs properly. The gatage at this address is in <br /> need of attention. We ate still in a quandary as to whether <br /> to testore it or tear it down and start over again. However, <br /> the season was not zight previously. Also, the structure was <br /> not nearly so deteriorated until neighbors started using it <br /> as a dumping ground for their qazbage and allowed people to <br /> come in and, as I was told by one neighbor "ram the garage <br /> with an old car until it started to sag" . These "concerned <br /> neighbors" didn' t bother to call either the police or me ! <br /> Maybe you can begin t-o see why we feel very discriminated <br /> against when we have been in process of improving this place <br /> and have been singled out for harassment by one city employee <br /> due to a grudge. We are progressing. We DO want to have the <br /> permits for things where they are needed in order to get <br /> inspections which will provide us the measure of deLense <br /> relative to liability in case of failure as you mentioned in <br /> your letter. These things have all been considered without <br /> having to have somebody try to shove them done our thtoats <br /> with a whole bunch of excess baggage thrown in, too. If it <br /> sounds like we are resentful , Tim, it is not you who has <br /> created the resentment . t9e know there are jobs to be done <br /> and respect that . Abuse of a system by an individual in a <br />