My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1932 HOYT AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
HOYT AVE
>
1932
>
1932 HOYT AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2017 4:18:02 PM
Creation date
2/18/2017 4:17:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
HOYT AVE
Street Number
1932
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STA�F REPORT TO BOARD OF .1DJ�'ST.11[1T <br /> CARL GIPSON <br /> D.4TE: 7anuary 21, 1482 <br /> APPLICANT: Carl Gipson <br /> 1932 Hoyt <br /> Everett, u'A 93201 <br /> LOCAT[ON OF PROPERTY: 1932 Hoyt - Locs 17, 13, 19 :ess 44 feet of <br /> 5-55 of 18 and I4. <br /> REQUESTED ACTION: A variance from Sc�ction 19.18.040 side <br /> yard requirEments which wculd providc <br /> zero (0) feet side yard setback inctead of <br /> the required five feet on both sides for <br /> reconstruction of a garage on an exis�in� <br /> foundation. <br /> EXISTING ZONING: R-3 Multi-Family, Low Density Residencial <br /> FXISTING LAND U5E: Single Family Residential <br /> ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USG: North: R-3/Single Family <br /> South: R-3/Single ramily <br /> East: R-3/Single Family <br /> West: R-3/Single Family <br /> EXHIBITS: <br /> 1. Staff Report <br /> 2. Vicinity Map <br /> 3. Plot Plan <br /> 4. Side and Front Elevations <br /> FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: <br /> 1. Existing Conditions: There is an existing garage on a 20 foot lot which is � <br /> presently built to each side property line. That building will be removed except � <br /> for the 4" concrete slab which will be used in reconstructing the garage. � <br /> Conclusion: The Sponsor is proposing to rebuild the garage on the existing slab to <br /> the approximate floor area coverage of the eristing structure, which would be <br /> consistent with how the property has been utilized in the past. <br /> � r <br /> 2. Preservation of Property Right� The existing garage is a legal non-conforming n .; <br /> use. � <br /> � �. <br /> m ; <br /> Condusion: The Variance is necessary to preserve a property right that has been � ' <br /> established and utilized for a number of years. <br /> � : <br /> 3. Public Welfare: The rebuilding of this structure to current Cuilding codes will T ' <br /> improve the appearance and safety of the structure. `� ' <br /> F : <br /> Conclusion: The authorization of the Variance will not be detrimental to che � ' <br /> public health and welfare of the property in the area. � <br /> 4. The granting of the Variance will not adversely affect ±he Comprehensive Plan. , <br /> �� . <br /> r; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.