Laserfiche WebLink
. . . nr,r.�.o ror>; or nrrr,Tc;,tar . <br /> PDZIlT 1. The fol.lo:ainy are the snecial cir.ciimsi:ances �•�hzch apply <br /> torny prope�-ty �•�luch depr5.ve me of riy;,L•s and privileycs ��hicL• are. ' <br /> • enjoycd hy� other pr.opert-ic:, zn ihe vicinity nndcr ti;e identicaJ. , <br /> zone classification. ' . . , <br /> The subject area is presently zoned R-3 , whict. allows a four-plex on the <br /> ' subject prorerty with parking requirements of 1.5 spaces per unit, but �ue to <br /> a 50' lot, there can only be 5� 10' stall's provided. <br /> POI11i 2. The variance I am requesting o�ill not be detrimental to <br /> � tY,e public �•felfare or injurious to the pro�,ertics or ir�p,.oveme�its <br /> in the vicinity oi a zone in which my property is located ber.ause: <br /> By demolishir� an out dated stru •t �re an r "�y„n a Fr,nr-n1Px n., rha cnhap�r <br /> Qroperty, it will upgrade [he area considerably, and will be compatible with <br /> � • several other multiples in the immediate area. <br /> i'D�t�i 3 . I£ this variance is not r.ranted, an u:znecessar.y hardship <br /> s�ili continue to i:he o�•mer of this property, the cause of whicli is <br /> be��ord his concrol because: , ' <br /> • Dimensions. of existing lot, which is 50' in width, and will accomodate a four- • _ <br /> plex a's per R-3 zoning requirement;,, but not of sufficient width to have 6 <br /> parking spaces. � <br /> ��i�'.1;i 4 . So as not to grant a special privilege to me by the . gr�n�?.ng <br /> o� tltis va_-iance I suhmit the follo��rinc� conliCions to be imposed �o <br /> as not t:0 'CdllS� inconsistencies '�aitli L-he ].imitations upon otLer <br /> • pro�ertics in the ���.cinil:y and �one in �•rhi.ch I ara locatcd. ' <br /> ' No�o,ff street parki� ir front of structure and no obj��tion to a cimilar ____._ <br /> variance for another property owner. ' <br /> � ' i <br />