My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3232 HOYT AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
HOYT AVE
>
3232
>
3232 HOYT AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2022 2:13:39 PM
Creation date
2/18/2017 5:45:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
HOYT AVE
Street Number
3232
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To: Allen GifTen <br />From: Dave Gavis <br />Jate: November ?,.. 198d <br />Subject: F'ar4;iny requirements <br />As L have previously discussed with you I have �erious reser— <br />vations over the proposed par4;ing requirements for the one <br />bedroom efficiency apartments (60�� sq. ft.) in the proposed <br />par4;iny e::empt �one. I feel that efficiency apartments in <br />cl�se pro:;imity te the homeport will attract naval personnel, <br />ard adequate parkin� should be provided for them. <br />I've called three Naval communities to see wh�t parl;ing re— <br />quirements the lo�al �urisdictions require. <br />1. Ma�,rport �laval Station; Atlantic Peach, Florida <br />2 stalls per dwelliny. multiple ramily and single family <br />2. Alameda Na�al Station; Alameda, California <br />1.5 stall� :or a one bedroom �fficiency apt.. 1.75 stalls <br />1ar 1 8< 2 bendroom apt. <br />_. San Diego, California <br />1.' stalls for a one bedroom apartment. 1.6 stalls for a^< <br />bedro�m apt. <br />The tra-Ffic division conducted a parking study o�f ttvo effi— <br />ciency apts. (���:7 Hoyt. 42'�� Hoyt) in October, 1987. The <br />managers of the comple:;es were contacted to find out the num— <br />ber of vehiclFs o�aned per unit. Of the �•2 units between the <br />ttvo comple;:es, :11 vehicles were owned and par4:eri on site. Fe— <br />member that p�r4;ing requirements sh�uld also include par{:iny <br />for visitors, and delivers. <br />I understand the effort to reduce the par4;ing requirement in <br />liopes of promoting development, but no less than 1 parking <br />=_tall per unit should be provided on site, and 1.�5 — 1.5 <br />stalls provided per unit. On street parallel par4;ing could be <br />chan�ed to angle par4;ing to provide the additional par4:in� <br />needed for visitors and deliveries. A parHing fund could be <br />create whereby a developer would contribute monies which the <br />City would in turn use to construct angle par4;ing in the gen— <br />eral vicinity. Changing parallel par4:iny to angle par4;ing <br />cast approximately S15!ii.l per stalls. The developer would need <br />to con+ribute betaieen �375 — 575�� dollars per unit to ma4;e up <br />for the visitor and delivery par4;ing I�e is not providiny an <br />site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.