Laserfiche WebLink
�� <br />f� <br />�u <br />. f;nbt <br />OFTE <br />SUp;EC� <br />1<en Callahan <br />Public Works <br />4-1-80 <br />Page Two B.O.A. <br />Item U9 <br />Item /i10 <br />C[S:is <br />tJl'� ��r I VI'i1.T1.I�V�. ��I iI VJ�tiJ�I'1GIr�N <br />This departmen: does not oppose a variance for fence height on this <br />properiy providing thP variance stipulates full compliance ;vith the proper?y <br />Jedication pc�rtion of Ordinance 55G-7S a�id that the fenee be constructed <br />in excess of 40 feet from the centerline of Casino 2oad (a� nrivate property <br />not needed for street irriprovement). <br />Granc�ng a variance •s�ithout Lhis stipulation �vould grar,t f3ible Baptist <br />Church a privilege that is not consisxent ivith what al{ other property <br />owners along Casino Road have been required to pro�ide. Also, if purchase <br />or condemnation of the right-of-way becomes necessary, costs oi damages <br />for removal and replacement ef the fenc:e would accrue to the public <br />and other owners along Casino Road. Thc :,treet improvement is imminent; <br />design for the improvement has begun. <br />I'hc I3oard of Ad;ustment <br />as a stioulation on the <br />3327 Hoyt - Parking V�riance Pro{,esal from 24 Oif-st[eet Stalls to 1G <br />Off-street Stalls <br />Given the i�ature of thc proposal (e£fir.;er+cy �r,;its), it is not expected <br />that a variai,ce wi11 add to the on-street parkinR demands of the area. <br />5206 S�ahurs; - Front Yard Setback Variance <br />Variance seems appropriate. Tfic error ma:ie is all t�.>o cemmon. However, <br />it appears to te an honest mistakc and the owner s:iovid r,at be �mduly <br />penalized. If landscaping, fencing or regrading would red�cr_ th� pcighborhood <br />impact, then it would be justi:ied. if nct, suggesi marinnce w�th n� conditions. <br />4} <br />..3 <br />N; <br />