4126 HOYT AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

� �" w e �I ij. That the authori.zstion of such variaz�ce will not be materially Iidetrimental to the public We7.fare or injurious to property in the I vicinity or zone in whictt th� property is located. I! i,l Finding: This area hza had parking problems wlth an insufficient�� number of off-street parki�,g. Traffic Engineering has listed 25 Cityi I� tnvolvements with members of the neighborhood and businesses relatic:�� I� to parking. Cemmunity meetings have been held tryi.ng to reduce parking� problems. ' Concluszon: A parking variance would add Lo ti�e problem in the areao i 4. That the granting of such variance will not adverseiy affect the' i Comprehensive General Plan. � Findi�: The compreh�nsive plan st�oWs this area as multiple family. Conclusion: This prejeet would have no effect on the codprehensive plan. RECOi�44ENDATION: DENY I� Deny the variance as requested by applicant !'or the following reasons: i1. There are no significant circumstances applying to this site except the type of units proposed. 2. The appl?.cant h:s not shown a substantial property right is lost. I i� 3• There has been a history of parking problems in the area and by � granting this variance� it Would add to them. i 4. One parking spacE per imit provides no guest parking. STAFF ANALYSIS: The Staff xuuld consider supportir.g this variance if the following could be shown. ! 1. Pr�vzde parking study acceptable to the City Traffic Engineer j showing that the reduced parking will funetion in this location !; for the type of '.nits proposed. II 2. Provide traffic atudy investigation showing that angle parking on Hoyt Avenue would work, and provide the angle parking on Hoyt so that the total aaartfall would not deerease the total parking in , the area. �� I ^2- 1505F 0