Laserfiche WebLink
� lii:'.^r!vtatcrials� <br /> Iuly<3,2003 <br /> Pagc 4 <br /> PLACING AND COMPACTING STRUCTURAL FILL <br /> All fill placcd as part of thc grading was placcd and compacted as struclural fill. SWctural <br /> fill placed within 3 to 5 feet of finishcd grade was compactcd to at lcast 95 percent of the <br /> maximum dry dcnsity (MDD) dctertnined in accordance wilh ASTM D 1557. A;1 sWctural fill <br /> placcd bclow 3 fect from finishcd gradc was placed and compactcd to at Icast 92 percent oC the <br /> MDD. SWctural fill placed in Lols II though L was primarily derived from cuts madc on lhe <br /> Seaway propcdy. However, fill placed to build up the PSA detrntion pond was derived from cuts <br /> made on thc PSA property and elsewhere on Rinker Materials property. <br /> We oUscrvcd placcment of sWctural fill at the site during lhe 1999, 2000 and 2061 grading <br /> scasons. Pill Placcmcnt and compaction was obscrved on an int::rmiticnl basis between <br /> (1)May 25 and Octobcr 18, 1999; (2) lunc 28, 2000 and ScptcmUcr I5, 2000; and (3) betwcen <br /> March 23 und Octobcr l2, 2001. Significant quantitics of fill werc ptaced at the site during Ihe <br /> 2000 and 2001 gading scacc:s. Tl�r. thida�css of fill placcd at thc site rangcd from <br /> ap;roximatcly 30 to 50 fcet within thc northem poction of the site, 20 to 2G feet within the ecntrel <br /> portion of the site, and about 40 to 50 fcct witliin the southern portion of the site. All fll was <br /> placcd and wmpactcd as sWctural fill. The sWctural filt was gcncrally cwluatcd by complcting <br /> in-placc density tcsts and by probing with a ii•inch-diamctcr steei probe rod. Soil cut from the <br /> adjaccnt Scaway Lot 8 property was uscd as struchval fill and thc fill was typically placed in 2-to <br /> G-inch loosc]iRs using sctapers and compacted using shecpsfoot and vibcatory stccl drum rollcrs. <br /> The rough grading plan for thc sitc was modificd from the original plan during lhe coursc oC <br /> grading. "Ihe origival objectivc was to have thc structucal fill placed within approximately 5 fect <br /> of rough gradc compactcd to at Icast 95 �xrccnt of the maximum dry dcnsity(MDD) dctcrmincd <br /> in accordanec with ASTM D 1557. 71�is objective was achieved in most areas. Howcvcr, <br /> bccause of changcs to the gcading plans in some areas, thcrc may bc only 3 to 4 fcet of structural <br /> fill compactcd to at least 95 perccnl MDD. SWcturat fill placcd 5 Ccet and bclow from rough <br /> gradc was placcd and compactcd lo at Icas[ 92 percent of thc MDD. T7ic soils wcm moislurc- <br /> conditioncd(generaliy dricd)as needed to achieve proper compaction during g;ading. <br /> Based on our oUservations, it is our opinion that the swctural fill placcmcnt wc oUscrved <br /> during our site visits was gcncrally placcd and compacted according to our recommendations and <br /> the projcct rcquircmcnts. <br /> REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY RAMPS <br /> Undocumentcd fill associated with tcmporary haul ramps that were conctructed down to thc <br /> pit Iloors from the top oC thc higlnvalls at the site was rcmovcd and replaccd with struclural fill. <br /> Tlie[cmporary haul ramp conslrucled on Uie ccnital and northwest�idc of the silc during thc 2000 <br /> grading scason was gcncrally comractcd to at lcast 92 perecnt MDD. Thc cdgcs oC thc 2000 <br /> ramp wcre Oaltcned to 311:1V and brnched during fll placcmcnt in 2001. Based on our <br /> oUscrvations and tcsting during our site visits, it is our opinion that thc undocumcntcd fill <br /> associated with thc tcttiponry ramps was removed according to our recommcndations and thc <br /> projcct requircmrnts. <br /> G c a i: n g i n c e r s FileNo. 6172-003-03 /� <br /> J <br />