Laserfiche WebLink
' A'ovcmLer G, 1972 <br /> Tl�e i•cgu]ar tnecting of thc Gi!y of I�•-t:cfl Eoard of Ar]jusLmcnl v�as I�cld al <br /> 7:30 P• :1. , 1V�vembcr G, 1972, in lhe Cily Ilall Counci] ChamUcr,, Ciiy I]all, <br /> Tvcrell, \NashinFton. <br /> Mr. Cronin presideJ, nQr. In�;ran:, Mr. llicl;son a��d Mr. Champion �vere <br /> �present, Mr. Grafi u�as aUseiiC. <br /> The reading of Che rninuLes of Ihe OcloUer 2,. 1972 rr�ecting was dispensed �vitl�. <br /> �— <br /> A hearing was hcld on Che app7icalion of Clinton E, Carnell, 2"L7. ,Tacicson Sh. , <br /> � �---_�_. <br /> 1?verehl, for a variance 1'ro�n Secl:i.on 15, 04. 0�0 P:. G C. (7oning Ordinancu) <br /> ! SubsecCion I3-5, for permission to allow a non-conforming advcrtising sign to <br /> � reniain. Lots 30, 31, and 32, I3locic 30, Pincl�ursC Div. 'B' (2229 Jacicson). <br /> ! AfCer visual obcervation ot Che ,ubjec� properCy, and co�isideriitg all the fac�.s, <br /> ; it �vas moved Uy n4r. L�gram, seconded Uy Mr. Champion, and unanimously <br /> carried to deny the applicant's rcqucsC for Chc follo�ving reasuns: <br /> 1. 'The�c was no hardship shown Uy thc applicanC. <br /> I2. If hhc variancc is g�•anCed ih woald be in nmi-conLormance wiCh Lhe <br /> comprehensivc general plan. <br /> As a condiHon to lhe dcnial of Chis variance it is sCipnlated H�at Lhe applicanC <br /> be given onc (1.) year trom lhe dale of Lhc hearing or Novembcr 6, 1973 fo <br /> remove tlie existing sign. <br /> A hearing was hc:ld on thc applicalion of Mr. YeCe HcgPe, 708 flawfhorne, <br /> L:vurett, for a variance from Secfion 15, 04. 090 L. G C. (Zoning Ordinance) <br /> Subsection C, minimum loC size and widLh, for peru�is::ion lo cet a house on <br /> a lot wilh less width, (3G'), than [hc �ninimtu�� of fifLy (E;0) feet as required <br /> by ordinancc. <br /> Affe: ��isuall}� vie�vinf•, ihe suUjecC prope�-ty and hearing considerable Cestimony <br /> by boll� Pl�e opponenLs and proponents, iC was moved by Mr. Ingram, scconded <br /> by Mr. llicicson and iuianimously carried Co deny the applicant's reyuest for <br /> the following reasons: <br /> 1. The variance would be in non-confor�nance wiNi t6e comprc)iensive <br /> gencral plan. <br /> 2. Thc unoccupicd hous� has retnained on thc premises for upyroximatcly <br /> ten (10) years an� is detrimenCal fo Lhe area. <br /> 3. There is no liardship ,hots�n Uy the apPlicanl Uccause the devcloper l�ac <br /> thc allm�nalivc ot replatting [lie nroperCy <br />