My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7209 JUNIPER DR 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
JUNIPER DR
>
7209
>
7209 JUNIPER DR 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2017 10:16:34 AM
Creation date
2/19/2017 10:16:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
JUNIPER DR
Street Number
7209
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Criterion No. 2• <br /> That such variance is necessary for the preservation and en- <br /> joyment of a substantial property right of the appellant pos <br /> sessed by the owners of other pcoperties in the same vicinity or <br /> zone. <br /> a. Findina: There are several other homes in the vicinity <br /> that have large rear decks and some of them appear to <br /> exceed the height limitation. <br /> b. Conclusian: Grantin� this variance would allow the owner <br /> a property riqht already possessed by others i, the <br /> vicinity and zone. <br /> Criterion No. 3• <br /> That the authorization of such variance will not be materially <br /> detrimental to the public welfare or iniurious to property in the <br /> vicinity or zone in which the propert� is located. <br /> a. Findina: The deck does not block anyone's view and the <br /> adjacent owner to the north where the deck exceeds the <br /> height limitation had constructed a six foot high board <br /> fence on the property line prior to the applicant <br /> buildinq the deck. The privacy screen constructed on the <br /> north end of the deck also provides additional privacy <br /> for the home to the nortti. <br /> b, Yo1l�lusion: It does not appear that granting this <br /> variance would be detrimental to the public welfare or. <br /> injurious to other property in the vicinity and zone. <br /> Criter.iorr No. 4: <br /> That the qranting of such variance will not adversely affect the <br /> Comprehensive General Plan. <br /> a. rindina: The Everett General Plan designation is single <br /> family residential and the use is single family <br /> residential. <br /> b. Conclusion: Granting this variance would not adversely <br /> affect the Everett General Plan. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, the Buard of Adjustment of the City of Everett <br /> does hereby order that the variance be GRANTED as requested by the <br /> applicant and further require the applicant to meet the following <br /> conditions. <br /> 1. Obtain a Building Permit for the deck. <br /> The action of the Board of Adjustment in GRANTING a variance <br /> shall be final and conclusive, unless within fiEteen ("l5) days <br /> from the date of issuance and signing of this order by the <br /> Chairman of the Board, an aggrieved person or persons obtains a <br /> writ of certiorari from the Superior Court of Washington for <br /> Snohomish County for the purpose of review of the action taken. <br /> DATED this ; � day of � 1988• <br /> y .;; f;i <br /> ,«�_�ir . ii4-,c. . <br /> Chairman, Board of Ad7ustment <br /> � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.