2620 LARLIN DR 2016-01-01 MF Import

A hearing �•�as held on the apolication of Gale t9hite, 2620 Larlin Drive, Everett P7ashin�;ton requesting.a variance from Section 15. 04.220 E.C.C. (Zoning Ordinance) to construcl a sight screen to a j maximum height of 72 inches in tlie front yard of Lot 163 Plat of. �; Valley View. � After visually viewing the subject property and considering all �the testimony presented it was moved by h1r.. Tngram, seconded by irir. Champion and unanimously carried to deny the applicants reques: for the follo�•�ing reasons: I 1. The entire Plat of Valley View shovrs the front yards are Iunfenced. I 2. The purpose expressed by the applicant can be achievefl by screen planting. 3. There was no hardship shown by the applicant. A hearing was heid on the applicatio:z of Lee Davis, 6807 Highland Drive, Everett [Jashington, for a variance from Secti.on 15.04.080 subsection C Everett City Code (Zoning Ordi.nance) �equiring a - minimum of sixty (60) ft. of frontage abuttin9 a public dedicated street and permission to utilize the Eastcrly 86.91 feet of Lot 21 Block 1 Beverly Hills Div. No. 1 access to said lot to be ttie Westerly twenty (20) feet oi the Easterly 85 feet of Lot 22, Block 1, IIeverly Hills Div. No. 1 utilizing the follosving described property. Lot 22, Block 1, Beverly Hills Division No. 1, Exce�t that portion described as follocas: Commencing at the �ortheasterly corner of said Lot 22, the true point of beginnina, hence �Oesterly along the Northerly boundary line oi said Lot 22, a distance of 65 feet; hence Southerly and parallel to the East boundary line of said Lot 22 to tfle Southerly boundary line of Lot 22; hence EasteLly along said Southerly boundary line of said Lot 22; hence Northerly along the Easterly boundary line of said Lot 22 for a distance of 134.94 feet to the true point of be- ginning. (Highland Drive and bladisoil) After visual observation of the subject property ar.d considering all the testimony presented it was moved by [•Ir. Champion, seconded by h1r. Ingrac, and unanimously carried to deny the applicants reyuest for the folluwing reasons: 1. Proper platting would require all properties in the vicinity be served by puUlic dedication streets. 2. The subject property is typical of t-lie majority of the lots in the arca and no particular ]tardship is shown to be present by this individual lot configuration. A hearing a�as held on the anplication of David IIrandvold, 3003 LomUard, �verett t4ashington, for a variance from Section 15.01.110 E.C.C. (Zoning Ordinance) Subsection E for permission to waive tlle minimum side, rcar and front yard requir.ements on thc following described property.