511 LAUREL DR 2016-01-01 MF Import

F!NDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Criterion No. 1: That the variance is necessary because of exceptional or extraordinary circumstances regarding the size, shape, topography, or location of the subjec t property; or the location o( a pre-existing improvement on the subject property that conformed to the zoning code in effect when the improvement was constructed. a. Findinqs: The applicant has stated that the requested variance i� necessary to accorc�modate several building additions which woiald modernize and update the functionality of this older single-famii� residence. Tiie applicard has also stated that if the structure were expanded to the west the hisloric nature of the house would be darnaged, and due to the layout of the existing structure and utility improvements on site, a kitchen addition could not be accommodated. According to Ihe Snohomish County Assessors records the structure was built in 1915, Nrior to the establishment of any zoning code requirements. Current rear setback requirements are as follows: twenty feet for living space and five feet for accessory building, i.e. garages, with the exception of those properties which abut an alley, ihe rear selback (or accessory buildings is reduced to zero feet. The existing residential portion of the slructure is nonconforining e•dith respect to the rear setback line. The residence appears to be located 18 feet (rom the northern property line rather than the code required 20 feet. The zoning code allows for structures to be expanded along the nonconforming setback line without a formal variance, provided the nonconformity is not increased. In this case the western addition is not increasing the noncon(ormity and therefore is considered ju:st an expansion of a nonconforming setback line. The portion of residence lo be expanded northward on site is the only part of the structure requiring a variance. The Board finds that the subject residence is located within the Rucker Hill National Historical District and is considered a contributing structure to tl�e District. Many of the homes in lhe area appreciate views of the Port and Puget Sound. Particular atteniion should be paid lo insure preservation of views from neighboring properties, as well as preservation of the historical character of the neighborhood. The applicant is encouraged to continue to work with the neighboring property owners over future second story additions. b. Conclusions: The subject property has unique and historical design features that limit the potential for Luilding expansion. Criterion No. 2: That the variance will not be materially detrimental to the properly in th� area of the �ubject property or to the City as a whole. 7. ( %=>