Laserfiche WebLink
J - f.y � �5 <br /> TO George Eastman � <br /> 1�/ �� ... '�_l <br /> `"o"' Lloyd Henning �F�/��' V .� <br /> o"TE April 18, 1975 ' �� � � <br /> !f�lb <br /> sue�ecr �;ewitt -(Permit to Locate an c��Y �F� E�E�'�,�. �•:�-��,-�� �°^=:���+�TON <br /> Awning over City Right-of-Way) <br /> On February 2, 1975, Mr. Mel Forrey, a general contractor, acting for <br /> Mra. Seibold, applied for a pr:rmit to remodel the aecond floor of the building <br /> located at the aforementioned addrese. Subsequent to this application, a <br /> plan review wae performed and correctione and conditions were added to the <br /> plan by the Plane Examiner. One of the notes was notifying the contractor <br /> that the awning muat be supported entirely from the building and be retractaUle, <br /> in compliance with Section 4506 of the building code. <br /> A building permit for the second floor remodel was issued on February 10, <br /> 1975, 8 days after the application. At thie time, the app??�ant was notified <br /> that we could ieaue a permit for the awning but the poate wc�uld have to be <br /> inetalled through a right-of-way use permit, At this time, and on several <br /> occaeiona thereafter, the applicant was adviaed that the permit to erect the <br /> awning, in compliance with tlie building code, would be isaued upon receipt <br /> of a letter atating that the avaning would be retractable and supported completely <br /> from the building. <br /> On March 4, 1975, application was made for a Right-of-Way Use Permit by <br /> Beata Seibold. <br /> in normal routing of the application, iY was determined that the awning was in <br /> direct conflict with the building code. During the next Four weeks (as atated <br /> previously), the applicant was advised by the Department of Community <br /> Development, building diviaion staff, that the Right-of-Way Use Fermit could <br /> not be ieaued until the City received a letter stating the awning wae aelf- <br /> supporting. <br /> On April 1, 1975, Hank Mills phoned Mrs. Seibold, who stated ehe would contact <br /> her deeigner regarding the non-supporting posts. <br /> On April 9th, Mr. Haggard phoned Wayne Kines of the Engineeribg Department <br /> to explain that Joe Kozloveki had all the neceaeary informati• n to proceea the <br /> permit. On the eame day, Mr. Kines requeated that Mr. Ir :loveki pro%ide <br /> the Engineering Department with the appropriate informat` so the permit <br /> could be ieaued. As it turned out, Mr. Kozlovski did not �,ave the information <br /> that Mr. Haggard said would clear the iasue. Mr, Kinea tried to contact <br /> Mr. Haggard to tell him that Mr. Kozlovski did not have the appropriate <br /> information. After not reaching Mr. Haggard, Mr. Kinea inatructed Hank Milla <br /> to get in touch with him. On April 10, 1975, Hank Mills phoned Mr, Haggard's <br /> office and left a measage for him to send us a letter stating that the posts are <br /> non-aupportive, decorative only. <br /> On April 16, 1975, a letter was received from Robert Haggard stating that <br /> ". . . given minor modifications. . . " the awning could be self-supporting. <br />