Laserfiche WebLink
- _ . . - <br /> ;I � � � - <br /> sucn meeting. RCW 42. 3�. 060 provides that no govcrnina body of <br /> a public ayency shali adopt any resolution, order, or directive <br /> ' (which terms include the granti::g of a variance by the Everett <br /> � � <br /> ' Board of Adji�stment) , except in a meeting open to the public. and <br /> i <br /> that "any action taken at neetings failing ta comply with the <br /> provisions of this section shall be null and void." <br /> � <br /> � RCW 42.030. 910 declares the purpose of the Open Public Meetings <br /> Act to be remedied and requires that they be "liberally construed. " <br /> � <br /> The conduct of the variance hearing in this case mocks the Open <br /> � Public Meetings Act's intent and purpose, as statgd in RCSJ 42. 30.010, <br /> i <br /> that delib erations be conducted openly. The comments and remarks <br /> of the members of the Board of Adjustment were conducted by Board <br /> members talking amongst themselves in such a manner as to nake sure <br /> their co�mnents were not heard by the members of the audience preser.t, <br /> nor susceptible of. being taken down as a record, and, in effect, <br /> were conducted as if in a private room without t?�e public present <br /> because the comments were not audible to eithet the recording�device <br /> ' or person, nor to the_pUblic but only to the members of the Board <br /> as they discussed the facts. See Affidavit in Support of Petition <br /> for Writ of Certiorari by TED DAHL, page 2_ <br /> The conduct of said hearing in such manner not only viclates the <br /> intent expressed in RCW 42. 30. 010; it also vio].ates the spirit and <br /> literal terms of RCW 42.30.060 that no resolution, order or directive <br /> shall be adopted except in a meeting "open to the public. " Constru- <br /> ing the words : "open to the public" :liberally, as nand�tc� by <br /> RCW 42 . 30. 910, this Court should hold thal- ior a meeting to bu "epen <br /> . -4- <br />