2902 HEWITT AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

I 'm not talking about what Mr• Dahl is talY.ing about, I �m just talking about the sozt of a resurgence on East Hewitt that parka��lisasea°result of �sccessfuleoperators wasn' t befo�re, P Y arkin lot was full at 9 :30 in like yourself. Now the p 4 the morning. " The Board did erroneously assume in its discussion that the applicant could provide other parking spaces, than those required by the variance, for the parking of its customers by arranging for them to park on other people' s property. although there is no evidence in the record of any right, title. interest or permit authorizing the applicant to prmvide such parking on other property. There is not disGussion in the record relatina toward the Board' s fourth finding required to be made by Section 19 .70. 060: affecttthegcomprehensivecaeneralnplanl"1 not adversely Based upon a record totally devoid of factual support for the conclusions it was about to draw, the Board proceeded to recite findings that it was required to make by Section 19. 70.060 of the the B�„a�_; ---; - ' Everett t•funicipal Code in order to grant this variance. However, Board did not even bother to recite all of the required findings, because it did not "like" one of them. Board member Baird said, "I think we' d better make a decision. No. 1 is all right." Board i member Russell said "I like 2. 3 and 4 better than No. 1. " Baird, I "O.K. Lets just read 2 , 3 and 9 . " The conduct of this entir� proceeding epitomizes arbitrary decision making and requires a reversal of tlie IIoard' s decision. Ig, CONCLUSION For the aforesaid reasons, the action of the Everett Board of -19-