1202 GRAND AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Criterlon No. l: That the variance is necessary because of exceptional or extraordinary circumstances regarding the size, shape, topography, or location of the subject property; or the location of a pre-existing improvement on the subject property that conformed to the zoning code in effect when the improvement was constructed. e• FindiOQg: The subject pazcel has exceptional circumstances due to the fact that the existing residence on the site is located only 17 feet from the front property line along Grand Ave. Thi� was created when the residence was constructed in the eazly 1900's prior to any zoning code requirements. The applicant pmposes to build a new 12 foot wide by 5 foot deep front covered porch on the house. This is not possible without encroaching into the front setback azea due to the existing house location. b. Conclusions:. The subject property has exceptional circumstances related to the pre-existing residence that was constructed in the eazly 1900's only 17 feet from the front property line when there were no zoning setback reqairements. Criterion No. 2: That the variance will not be materially detrimental to the property in the azea of the subject property or to the City as a whole. a. Findin¢s;, The applicant states that the proposal will not be detrimental to the azea; it will only enhance the look and quality of the area. The City provided written notice to all property owners within 300 feet of the subject property and no comments were received. The proposal has been reviewed for compatibility with the chazacter of the neighborhood area and has been approved by the Historic Commission. Conclusions: The proposed variance will not be materialiy detrimental to the neighborhood area or the City as a whole. 4 �