Laserfiche WebLink
1 � <br /> b. Conclusions: The proposed use of the subject property for <br /> residential purposes is consistent with the Everett General <br /> Plan. <br /> Critcrion No. 6: <br /> The need for the requested variance is not the result of a self-created <br /> hardship. <br /> a. Findings: The applicant states that the proposed tloor area <br /> ratio is consistent with other; in the block and that the <br /> hardship is creatcd by the fact ,hat lhe lots in the area were <br /> established long before current zoning standards. <br /> b. Cooclusions: Thcre are unique circumstances related to the <br /> subject property that �vere created before zoning code <br /> standards. Therefore, the need for the requested variance is <br /> not the result of a self-created hardship. <br /> i�GW, THEREFORE, Uased upon ti�e applicant's s�te p{an, the �oard o; <br /> Adjustment of the City of Everett does hereby order that the variance be <br /> GRANTED as requcsted. <br /> The action of the Board of Adjustment in GRANTING a variance shall be <br /> final and conclusive, uni.�� �.�:�!•��� �'�enty-one (21) days from the datc of <br /> issuance and signing oi '.:us arl.cr lry thc Chairman of the Board, an <br /> aggrieved person or persor- ����:aic: a writ of certiorari from the Superior <br /> Court of Washington for Snohomish County for the purpose of review of <br /> the action taken. <br /> DATLD this 6th day of August, 2001. <br /> � � . <br /> Chairma�i, Boazd o djustment <br /> ���I <br /> G <br />