1930 GRAND AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

; •---, �� +*Pr�on No. 3• Q � — . That the variance will only qrant the subject property the y�7[ same general rights enjoyed by other property in the same M� �y area and zone as the subject property. �� a. Findinas: Nany of the existing homes in the area of �0 the subject property were constructed in the earl� �a1� 1900�s and do not conform to current setback o,� requirements. �� b. �onc�Lio�: The majority of properties in the area �` do not meet setback requirements. The qranting of �,�, the variance will allow the subject property the M same riqhts enjoyed by other properties in the same rn area. M �� ' Criterion 110. 4• '�� That the variance is the minimum necessery to allow the � subject property the general riqhts described in Criterion 3. a, gj�g: See Crtterion /3. � � �� b. Conclusiona: See Criterion 3 . �ritarion N�. 5• i �� • The grantinq of the variance is consistent with the qoals and policies of the Everett General Pl.an. a, gj�qQ: The Everett General Plan designates this 1_ property ae 1.6 Multiple Fami�y Residential. � �� b, roncl +�aiona: The qranting of the variance is consistent with the goals and policies of the � 1_1�� Everett General Plan. ` �riterion no. 6: The need for the requested variance is not the result of a self-created hardship. �� . H, gj�nqg: The applicant has stated that the need for the varianca is due to a recent survey which identified the true south property line. The applicant believed that the existing fence established by some 3o year old posts along the south property line was accurate. The recent sur.vey conducted by the City revealed that the applicent's £ence Was encroachinq onto City property by three feet and would have to be removed. ' This also meant that the applicant's proposed addition was setback only four feet from the actual