2008 GRAND AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

, . . . EIJVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST SXPLANATIONS 2000 GAAND AVENUE CONDOMINIUM (Continued) anv specie� of flora? It would be the intention of the developer to remove only those trees and ground cover which would otherwise impede on prevent actual building construction. A certain amount of landscaping would be added to enhance building appearance. However, typical local nursery stock would probably be utilized. (6) Noise. Will the ro osal increase exi3tin noise levels? � The additional 12 res dential unit.s would ncrease community � activity but would only involve normal residential � construction activity noise and "typical" residential � neighborhood noise . � (7) Light and (}lare . Will the ro osal roduce new li ht or lg are? A certain degree of add t ona 1 ghting t�n possible glare would be associated with the proposed buildind. How- ever, this would be normal lighting and it is not expected to craate a serious environmental problem. , (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, diatribu- ! tion, density or growth rate of the human population of an � ; area? The completion of� L•he proposal would result in the . � addition of 12 residential units . Due to the nature of ! the developmettt (luxury view condominiums) the people who � have i.ndicated the most interest in living there are mostly ` - aingle adults. Therefore, even if a multipier of 2 j peraons per unit is uaed, a maximum population increase of � 24 people would reault. ` (13) Transnortation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : s " i (a) 6eneration of additional veriicular movement? Completion � o�` this proposal is expected to invo ve the use of �1.5 cars per household. This figure is given as a maximum given the nature of the development as defined in reaponse Ml.l (Poaulation) . , � ; If one usea a multiplier of 4 vehicle trips per unit i per day, traffic movement of 48 vehicle trips per . �� day could be expected. This figure is an approximation based on nature of the pro�ect. Page 3 of 4 � .