Laserfiche WebLink
f <br /> BELL, INGRAM.JOHNSON f. LE\�EL <br /> �cw�5 n. BELL ATTJRNEYS AT LAW 7E��nwou[ <br /> WILUAM E INGFhM 61g FIRST NATIOHAL BAqR pUIIDING ALcINC 3-9271 <br /> RICMARO B. JOHNSON <br /> �ownRo e. �tv[� EVERBTT,WpSMINGTON 98701 <br /> T��O�AASA. GISH ' �) �,j '.�I I� <br /> t+rarcii l0 , 1971 J i ;[ �i; „ ;� ' ' <br /> � , � i <br /> �. . ? � i971 � <br /> Council of the City of 1,vei•ett, ' '�����R'S nFf=T"; <br /> City Hall, <br /> �verett, Washington <br /> Re : Resolution 397.z/7-7/;�lbuilding at 2903 Grand Avenue <br /> oear Sirs : <br /> I have been consulted by F9r. Ed 'Paylor with respect to <br /> notice received from you with respect to the above <br /> referenced Resolution, which Resolution advises him that <br /> pur�uant to Uniform Building Code, 203 (d) you intend <br /> to proceed with the work specified in the original notice <br /> to ^7r. Taylor. <br /> t-ir. Taylor is out of town and has contacted me by phone. <br /> He does not have a cc+py of this prior notice but believes <br /> that it was a notice to perform certain repairs on the <br /> building in question. He has been advised that at the <br /> council meeting Mr. Royce said the building should be torn <br /> down. <br /> This is to advise you 'that if you proceed with tearing <br /> down this building , N.r. Taylor will look to you for his <br /> damages . lie informs me that the building, as is , would have <br /> a value of approximately $8 ,000. 00 , and he would Ue damaged <br /> in this amount if the building were removed. <br /> I am under the impression that ;4r. Taylor or a representati.ve <br /> of his advised you that he was attempting to secure refinaiic- <br /> ing from the FHA on this building and expected to proceed <br /> with repair and remodeling of the building , in accordance with <br /> I•'ItA standards , as soon as a}�proval was received. This appli- <br /> cation is being processed through Carro.11 Hortgage Company , <br /> who also has a mortgage on the property and will suffer damages <br /> to their security if the building i:; removed. In view �f the <br /> foregoing, it would not appear wise for the city to proceed <br /> with a demolition. <br />