Laserfiche WebLink
�. �cor. w�rcMisok <br />WIIL�P.V R. �'.�.irCR <br />•iMpT�� C. 40EA�Np <br />Ms. Mary Cunninqham <br />9Anior Plannar <br />City of Everett <br />7002 Wetmore Avenue <br />Everett, Waehington <br />Re: <br />Dear Ms. Cunningham: <br />HUTCHISON 8 FOSTER <br />ATTORN[Yi AT lAW <br />COOOE CG'�Aq VI�LL[Y 110�'� <br />•Ofr O«�CC !OY 09 <br />�YHNWOOO. WAsMINOtOM ��ad'0009 <br />98201 <br />June 9, 1989 <br />�CL�PnOnL <br />RO�1 9)�.i�a] <br />:2001 a>O•�•�+� <br />Pursuant to your lettar of JunQ 7, 1989, the following is to <br />be considered an addendum to tha Notice of Appeal filed on bahalf <br />of Mr. & Ma. Howard Ozmun by the undezsigned on tha 3oth day of <br />May, 19s9. in particular, the followinq are thQ speciiic adverse <br />impact that the proposal presents to the neiqhborhood, whieh <br />advarse impacts hav� not bQan mitigated by the DNS. <br />Dansitv. The proposed developmont calls for tha construction <br />of 28 units on 12,000 square Peet of proparty. This would raeult <br />in an ef2active yield of tha property of 101.64 units per acre. The <br />eurrent zoning for the property vould allow 25 - 5o daelling units <br />p�r acrQ. Therefore, this proposal exeeeds the maximum yield <br />allowad by tha City ordinance moze thari tvo fold. Althouqh the mere <br />density of the proposal has certain downstream advarse impacts, <br />which will be more fully addresgefl harain, the density oi the <br />proposal presents a siqnificant adverse impact, which impact is not <br />mitigated by the conditions of the DNS. <br />The appallants submit triat there are no conditione which could <br />be imposed upon the proposal which could mitiqate the adverse <br />impacts that the density wili hava on the neighborhood. The shaer <br />number of persons who would raside in the proposed structure would <br />imposa a siqnificant and neqative impaet on the entize <br />neighborhood. Density requirem�nt im�+osed by local ordinences, in <br />addition to being desiqned to prevent overloading the strain on <br />existing neighborhood services, are lurther designed to limit the <br />number ot persons who would zeside in a given area. The apgeliants <br />submit that the number of persons who would reside in the proposed <br />structure would pose ssrious overcrowding to the neighborhood, <br />which impact is not mitiqated by any oi the conditions imposad upon <br />the DNS. <br />••eg�.�ve Traffic imnact. The application itself contemplates <br />QCh iBi1' � <br />