Laserfiche WebLink
To: Ms• Mary Cunninqham ' <br />June 9, 1989 <br />page 4 <br />on the site. As stated before, the only vay to reduce the traflic <br />and parking impacts is to reduce the traffic flow and reduce the <br />parking requirements. with respect to the recreational impnct, the ; <br />proposal should ineorporate on-site inarinttheastr et oir on the ' <br />reduce the likelihood of Children play <br />sidewalk. This ean only be accomplished by tne reduction of the i <br />size of the building, leaving room for the construction of such on- <br />site recrastional lacilities. <br />Neaative Noise imv�S. one of trie naqative impacts imposed <br />upon the neigEborhood by tha sheer number of potantial residents <br />is tha noise impact upon tha naiqhborhood. No amount of site••screen <br />fenca or landscaping, currQnt conditio be� mi igat d Wthr udhlgthe <br />this impact. This impact can only ro act, which can only <br />raduction in the number of r�sidents of the p � <br />be accomplishsd by a reduction in the number o! ur.its. Tha <br />areacwhichlw uld mi�t�i9ata ha adversa noiseaimpact ofetherprojectk <br />in summary, th� adverse QlPect of.the proposed project is <br />primarily tha result of the density of the pro ark ng,s n isen <br />improvement will adversely gftQvehicles to all rasidents of the <br />saPety, and acca�s by emerq�ncy the DNS do not mitigste <br />neiqhborhood. The conditions imposed bY <br />the6e adverse Rflects in any manner. To the contrary, the <br />appallants submit that the only condition Whieh would adequately <br />mitigate thase adverse affects would be to raduce the number of <br />units proposed. <br />If you have any other quastions or eommants, please do not <br />hesitate to contaet the undsrsigned. <br />cc: Mr. 8 Ms. Hosrard Ozmun <br />Very tzv1Y Yours, <br />HUTCHISON �: FOSTER <br />� <br />QCIti gT Z <br />pc� �I <br />.«.END... <br />