My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
901 GRAND AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
GRAND AVE
>
901
>
901 GRAND AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2022 3:11:18 PM
Creation date
2/20/2017 9:55:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
GRAND AVE
Street Number
901
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� �. <br />.��ua:.�Tiv� �i�_�r;:��L�;�� <br />}�`e roquest n variancc to the 1ot cov �ragc lituit o� 3�,�� as <br />the ordinance now stands. We widerst�id that this ordinance will <br />sowi Ue changed in our favors but we hope to start i•onstruction <br />UeSore that change is made. Iie tJ15I1 to build an addition to our <br />existing house tliat would put lot coverage at approxic�ately 45;0� <br />computed using �ross floor area. Howevor� it computod using �round <br />coverage only� the house� including proposed addition� would covr:r <br />less thtan 27Yo of tl�e lot. <br />Our lot is 50 Teot Uy 130 feet (6g00 sq, St.), The esistin� <br />hauso cwlsists of main floor (11q0 sq, ft,) and unfinished half- <br />basement (65U sq, lt.�. The propose� t�ao-story addition iaould be <br />npproximately 550 sq, ft, on each i'loor� 1:otaling 1100 sg, ft, <br />Tlie existing garage would be torn dotm, <br />Our home is located on a uj00 sq. ft, lot. Compased to <br />nearby liomes located on lots of sir.iilar size� our hoii�e is smaller <br />than uvera�e. The proposed sddition would add onl.y 5j0 sq, ft, to <br />the lot coverage. <br />The requested variance is �iecessary for the proscrvation and <br />enjoyment of a substantial property rig}lt, i�fe feel that other <br />home owners in this area have Ueen alloired to excoed lot coverage <br />limits where it would incroase the esthetic and monotary value of <br />tlieir property, SJo feel this would Ue the case for our home� as <br />well, <br />Tho nuthorization of this variance will not bo materially <br />detriu�ental to the puUlic welfare or injurious to property in <br />tho zone in which the property is located. On the contrary� t17e <br />proposed addition will increaso tlie vAlue of our property and <br />bring it closer to that of other hom�s in the aroa. Setbacics <br />from streets anfl adjoining propert}� would remain the same, <br />The granting of a lot coverage variance <br />advoraely affect the cowprehensive general <br />will remain a single family dwelling. <br />in this ca=e will not <br />Plaii, The property <br />EXHIBIT 3 <br />NAiiRATZVE STATEMEEPTTP <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.