904 GRAND AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

b. Conclusion: There are unusual circumstances applying to the property and use due to the desire to maintain the architectural style of the home and still be able to provide more living space for a growing family. That such varia7ioe is necessary for the preservation and en- joyment of a substantial property right of the appellant pos sessed by the owners of other properties in the same vicinity or zone. a. F=ndina:_ There nre other residences in the area that are two story with dormers. in addition, the height limitation in this zone was reduced in January of 1988 from 35 feet so there are other homes in the area that exceed 28 feet in height. b. �o cl�� Granting this variance will allow the applicant a property right already possessed by others in the vicinity and zone. That the authorization of such variance will not be materially detrimental to trie public welfare or injurious to property in the vicinity or zone in wriich the property is located. a. F�ndina: The proposed dormers are on the rear of the house and will not block anyone's view. No adverse comments have been received after notification of property owners within 300 feet. b. Go c�usion: Grantinq this variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity and zone. �ri�e`ripp NO. 47 That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the Comprehensive General Plan. a. �yndina: The comprehensive plan designation for this area is single family detached and the use is the same. b. �onclusion: Granting this variance would not adversely affect the comprehensive plan. [tSCOMSNDATION: APPROVE the variance as requested by applicant with trie followiny conditions. 1. Construction to be done per the site plan and elevations submitted with this application. Yrepared by ��e-../ -�lai�*� ltevlewed by � �+!✓�'T��"�