My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
904 GRAND AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
GRAND AVE
>
904
>
904 GRAND AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2017 3:20:47 PM
Creation date
2/20/2017 9:55:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
GRAND AVE
Street Number
904
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�- � � , � � <br />, <br />_ . � � <br />�✓ <br />� � , ,.. , , , <br />V <br />, PINLEY/ARCHlT�CTS, AIA, PS. <br />n <br />, <br />August 11, 1988 <br />NARRATIVE STATEMENT <br />RE: Address Narra��:ive Statement questions, "City of Everett - <br />Applicacion for Variance" <br />In regards to Question A, the answer is two-fald. One, in order <br />to make the existing third (attic) floor habitable (because of <br />growing family size), the owner and the Architect have chosen to <br />add two dormered areas to the west end of the existing roof. This <br />will create adequate head ruom throughout a good deal of the third <br />(attic) floor. Two, keeping in mind the current cost of construction� <br />it is econanically undesirable to add to the existing west end (at <br />ground level) and maintain the hane's original architectural design. <br />' � � It is our determination that single family residences on either <br />siue of the 300 foot subject property have under gone similar, if <br />-�- -- - not the exact same alterations. We see, therefore, no reason not <br />to grant the residence in question the same privileges. <br />This variance shali in no manner limit existing panoramic views <br />from neighboring residences. One, because of placement of these <br />-�• -�-- --• • residences on their properties and two, because proposed additions <br />to the west roof shall neither project past nor above existing <br />'_ __.__ '_ _..__. building lines. <br />Grantir.g of such variance will adversel,� affect the <br />;Canprehensive General P1 q. e exisking residence shall remain <br />as a single famil,�-weg�'�rfc . / <br />Narrative Statement Concerning Pending Variance <br />� A variance is requested for installation of two new dormers out <br />of the existing attic space at the west side (back) of this house. <br />These will be at a height abov� new zoning height maximum of <br />28 feet. <br />In reference to item one, the new dorniers will not extend above <br />the existing roof line (at approximately 32 feet). The existing <br />house is situated in an area of similar houses, most having <br />heights exceeding the new zoning height maximum. The new domers <br />will not inhibit or in any way detract from any neighboring <br />house views. <br />,a ,' % C �I - <br />✓' <br />� L W— _ <br />%� <br />Mark Peterson <br />Wm G FirM..� III G I A <br />��; <br />„ <br />� �: <br />�'c;.� ..�,;i i _� � <br />�_'' ;)S n, : � -..� � <br />'-�Iy`b.. _.... �;,yJ � , �� . <br />���'7,....`i�_. j�1 -�_, <br />_ / � � �, <br />E%NIBIT 3 <br />NARR7ITIVE STATEMENT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.