My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4626 HARBOR LN 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
HARBOR LN
>
4626
>
4626 HARBOR LN 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 2:43:18 PM
Creation date
2/20/2017 10:17:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
HARBOR LN
Street Number
4626
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
l <br />Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation NGA Fi.e No.853512 <br />Fox Residence Underpinning and Retaining wall Design August 3, 2012 <br />Everett, Washington Page 4 <br />undocumented fill that supports the walkway anti a portion of the residet.cc is loose and has a high <br />potential for subsidence in an earthquake. The risks will be reduced after the recommendations in this <br />report arc inmplemcnted. <br />Erosion Hazard <br />1-he criteria used for determination of the erosion hazard for affected areas include soil type, slope <br />gradient, vegetation cover, and groundwater conditions. The erosion sensitivity is related to vegetative <br />cover and the specific surface soil types, which are related to the underlying geologic soil units. The Soil <br />Survey of Snohomish County Area. Washineton, by the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) was reviewed to <br />determne the erosion hazard of the on -site soils. The surface soils for this site were mapped as <br />Alderwood-Everett gravelly sandy loams, 25 to 70 percent slopes. The erosion hazard for this material is <br />listed as moderate to high. It is our opinion that the erosion hazard for site soils should be low in areas <br />where the site is not disturbed. <br />CONCLUSIONS AND [RECOMMENDATIONS <br />General <br />it is our opinion from a geotechnical standpoint that the issues related to fill settlement with this site can <br />be mitigated. it is also our opinion that the northern and western portions of the garage were constructed <br />on loose fill material. Our explorations indicate that loose fill is located below the foundation lines, <br />garage slab, and underneath the walkway directly adjacent to the northern and western sides of the garage. <br />We recommend that the foundations on the norther and western side of the garage be underpinned using <br />2-inch pin piles. We provide recommendations for pin pile installation in ule Foundation <br />improvements subsection of this report. The structural engineer will determine the number and actual <br />layout of the pin piles. The pin piles will likely be installed on the outside of the foundations. The garage <br />slab may also need to be supported on pin piles or a portion of the garage slab can be removed along with <br />associated fill to allow for placement of structural fill or a new slab. This can be evaluated during final <br />design. <br />It is our opinion that a Compac Keystone block wall constructed on the western side of the house to treat: <br />a new walkwaylpatio area should provide permanent support for a walkway on that side of the residence. <br />The existing concrete walkway and underlying fill would be removed as part of wall conctruuion. We <br />recommend that all of the existing undocumented fill be removed and replaced with compacted structural <br />fill with geogrid reinforcement behind the wall to prevent future settling. The underlying medium dense <br />NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, !,'VC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.