Laserfiche WebLink
' <br />Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation <br />Anderson landslide Repairs <br />' <br />4704 Harbor Lane <br />Everett, Washington <br />September 15, 2009 <br />NGA pile No. 816909 <br />' <br />Page 8 <br />rIn addition, we also observed seeping water on the slope just below the top of the slope during our visit in <br />1 early July. We have not observed this condition since. Based on the soil-, encountered in the explorations <br />and observed on the slope, it is our opinion that this seepage was likely the remnants of the water that was <br />discharged onto the slope front the waterline breakage. This water likely travelled through the upper <br />sandier soil horizon and daylighted on the slope along the top of the low permeability layer. <br />Vegetation on the ravine slopes generally has an impact on the amount and effects of groundwater <br />seepage through seasonal evapotranspiration. During summer months, vegetation evapotranspirates <br />significantly more water than during the wet, winter season. This is particularly the case with deciduous <br />vegetation than with evergreen vegetation. We noted that the vegetation that had been located within the <br />slopes that had been cut were it mixture of deciduous trees and evergreen trees; however, the mixed <br />underbrush mostly still remains. Within the slide area, all vegetation has been removed by the moving <br />earth. Some reduction in the amount of evapotranspiration should be expected due to the removal of the <br />I deciduous and evergreen bees, and particularly within the exposed soil slide area. Replacement of <br />selected evergreen vegetation within the influence of the seepage zones, and onto the exposed soil areas, <br />will aid in reducing long -terns seepage and increase site area evapotranspiration. However, we do not <br />I_ anticipate significant long-term increases of water seepage near the toe of the slope as a result of <br />vegeu,tion disruption. This is due to the fact that this seepage is derived from a relatively large recharge <br />area Ih,,, extends beyond [his site. <br />SENSITIVE AREA EVALUATION <br />Seismic Hazard <br />We reviewed the 2003 International Building Code (IBC) for seismic site classification for this project. <br />Since medium dense/stiff to dense/hard sand, silt, and silty sand deposits generally underlying the site, the <br />site conditions best fit the IBC description for Site Class D. <br />Hazards associated with seismic activity include liquefaction potential and amplification of ground <br />motion by soil deposits. Liquefaction is caused by a rise in pore pressures in a loose, fine sand deposit <br />beneath the groundwater table. The medium dense/stiff to dense/hard sand, silt, and silty sand deposits <br />interpreted to underlie the site have a 10\v potential for liquefaction or amplification of ground motion. <br />NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />f-f <br />