Laserfiche WebLink
' Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation <br />Anderson Landslide Repairs <br />4704 Harbor lane <br />Everett, Washington <br />September 15, 2009 <br />I NGA File No. 816909 <br />Page 19 <br />tic -back rod within the length of the no-load zone. A sand cement grout should not be allowed in the <br />performance test anchors, as it will impact the lest results. <br />Soil Design Values: We have not advanced any explorations in the areas where the anchors are planned. <br />Therefore, the design strengths for anchor adhesion are difficult to estimate. If silts are encountered, <br />creep will become an important factor in the design loads. For use in design of the performance anchors, <br />we estimate an allowable grout to soil adhesion of 2,000 pounds per linear foot (pit) for minimum 4-inch <br />diameter grouted anchors. This value is presented for planning purposes only and should be confirmed or <br />modified using the data obtained from the performance testing prior to production tie -back installation. <br />Tic -back Installation and Testing: The contractor should be responsible for using equipment suiteC :or <br />the site conditions. We do not recommend the use of open hole methods for the purpose of installing the <br />tic -backs. Secondary grouting to increase soil adhesion may be used; however, if secondary grouting is <br />used, the anchors should be tested using the methods outlined for the performance testing. <br />Five percent of the anchors, but a minimum of two, should be perfonnance tested to 200 percent of the <br />anchor design capacity. 'file perfonnance tests should consist of cyclic loading in increments of 25 <br />percent of the design load, as outlined in the Federal Highways Administration (FHA) report No. <br />-'HWA/ItD-82/047. Final soil adhesion design values will be based on these tests. The test location <br />should be detennined in the field, based on soil conditions observed during excavation. All production <br />tie -backs should be proof -tested to at least 130 percent of design capacity. The tic -back testing program <br />should be reviewed and monitored by NGA. <br />Slope Improvements and Drainage <br />After the wall has been successfully installed, the portion of the slope below the wall should be further <br />investigated and slope improvements perforated to lessen the potential for future erosion and sliding <br />below the wall. These conditions, if not addressed, could lead to future slides and may eventually <br />undennine the wall. <br />These improvements should include removing the vegetative cover and slide debris directly below the <br />wall to a depth of four to six feet, benching the slope below the wall to a gentle inclination, placing rock <br />NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />2S <br />