My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4704 HARBOR LN 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
HARBOR LN
>
4704
>
4704 HARBOR LN 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 3:06:50 PM
Creation date
2/20/2017 10:23:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
HARBOR LN
Street Number
4704
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
460
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Anderson Slide <br />Shoring Plan Comments <br />Everett, Washington <br />October 28, 2009 <br />NGA Pile No. 816909 <br />Page 2 <br />the upper loose material from time to time which caused this material to travel down the slope under <br />gravitational forces, as the soils lost their shear strength. The recent slide was caused by water leakage <br />that saturated the upper soils. What the wall does is retain a portion of this material, and allow for the <br />removal of the remainder of the loose material, as part of the planned grading below the wall, thus <br />eliminating the source of the slides. Once the wall is installed and the loose soil below the wall is <br />removed, the remainder of the slope would be covcrcd with erosion control material and vegetation as <br />described in the report. Of course, the downed trees, slide debris piles, and unstable material would be <br />removed prior to placing the erosion control elements. This is standard practice and we have <br />successfully implemented erosion control systems on similar slopes in the nearby vicinity. This work <br />would be completed under our supervision, and once the work is implemented, we would issue a final <br />letter stating that the erosion control systems have been successfully completed. <br />The other issue that seems to be a major point of contention is the final drainage picture of this site. At <br />the time our report was prepared, our understanding was that all runoff generated on this site would be <br />lightlined into the existing IIDPG pipe that currently conveys water to the bottom of the slope. This is <br />still the most prudent and natural way to control runoff and prevent it from reaching the slope. I lowever, <br />even if runoll" from the Anderson property is allowed to shect0ow towards the slope, or even if another <br />waterline breakage would to occur in the future, water flow should not cause future slides. The wall will <br />act as a large dispersal system and will allow any runoff reaching the wall to infiltratc/disperse uniformly <br />over the slope below the wall. This mechanism, coupled with the recommended erosion systems below <br />the wall, should prevent any significant future landslides. <br />We should note that the slope continues onto the neighboring property to the north. it is crucial that the <br />recommended erosion control systems cover all exposed sloping ground, including neighboring property, <br />for the system to function properly. We should also note that steep slopes in this area, including the <br />slope in question, will always be prone to minor erosion/sloughing events, especially during extreme <br />weather. This is it natural process and should be expected from time to time. <br />In closing, we have designed and supervised the successful installation of numerous slide stabilization <br />systems in the Puget Sound area and within the City of Everett. There are two examples of similar <br />projects only a few hundred feet down the road, on the bluff -side of Mukilteo Boulevard. We are more <br />NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />Z/S <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.