Laserfiche WebLink
Geotechnical Engineering i ort <br />Johnson Residence Addition <br />Everett, Washington <br />J-1280 <br />27 February 2002 <br />Page 4 <br />Based upon conditions observed at the site and our analyses, the project is feasible from <br />the geotechnical perspective. However, the presence of low density fill and native soils, and the <br />proximity of the dwelling to the slope extending toward Belvedere Lane will necessitate the use <br />of extended foundations in order to reduce the potential for foundation settlement, as well as <br />foundation displacement in the event of a landslide. Our conclusions and recommendations <br />regarding environmentally sensitive areas, foundations, and drainage are presented below. <br />Seismic Criteria <br />Figure 16-2 presented in the 1997 Uniform Building Code classifies the subject site as <br />being within Seismic Zone 3. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the site and <br />published geologic literature, it is our opinion that a Soil Profile Type of Sc should be used to <br />describe the average properties within the upper 100 feet of soil beneath the site. This <br />designation describes soils that are considered very dense with a shear wave velocity of 1,200 to <br />2,561 feet per second, Standard Penetration Test values greater than 50 and an undrained shear <br />strength greater than 2,000 psf. <br />Environmentally Sensitive Area Considerations <br />Title 19, Section 2.080 of the Everett Municipal Code defines geologic hazard <br />environmentally sensitive areas. Based upon conditions encountered on site and our analysis, it <br />is our opinion that the slope extending below the dwelling toward Belvedere Lane meets the <br />EMC jurisdictional criteria for a steep slope hazard and an erosion hazard. Our analysis also <br />indicates that the slope is at risk of landsliding during a seismic event due to the combination of <br />soil conditions and slope inclination. <br />Section 37.080 of the EMC indicates that a 25-foot buffer shall be established from the <br />top, toe, and sides of sensitive areas. The northeast comers of the proposed dwelling addition <br />intrude slightly into the 25-foot steep slope buffer, as shown on Figure 1. The existing deck is <br />located within the buffer, and at least two of the proposed new deck supports are shown within <br />the buffer. 1 :ovided that the recommendations for foundation construction presented herein are <br />followed during construction, it is our opinion that construction of the proposed dwelling and <br />deck additions within the 25-foot steep slope buffer will not decrease the stability of the slope or <br />have an adverse effect on the slope. The recommended dwelling foundation construction <br />methodology is expected to reduce the risk of landslide activity within the dwelling footprint. <br />Specific foundation design and construction recommendations are presented subsequently. <br />Slope Stability Considerations <br />The explorations completed for this study disclosed very loose and soft fill and native <br />soils above medium dense to very dense native granular soils. The interpreted distribution of <br />soils along a subsurface profile extending through the steep slope below the dwelling is shown <br />on Figure 2. The subsurface profile location is shown on Figure 1. We analyzed the stability of <br />Zipper Zeman .associates. Inc, <br />18905 33' Avenue West, Suite 117 LSnnwwd. Wuhington 98036 (425) 771 - 3304 CTI <br />