Laserfiche WebLink
3. Any alterations permitted to the requirement of this Ordinance shall be the <br />minimum necessary to allow for reasotwble use of the property. A number of <br />other residences in the area are as large as this proposed 3,610 square foot <br />residence and 864 square foot garage. The applicant proposes to reduce the 25 <br />foot front setback to 19 feet in order to keep the steepness of the driveway to a <br />minimum and to provide the largest setback possible from the stream. Rockeries <br />over three feet in height within the front setback are necessary for the driveway <br />cut. <br />The height of the residence is allowed to be built up to a maximum height of 30.6 <br />feet. The City of Everett calculates building height by taking measurements from <br />the midpoints of the smallest rectangle enclosing the footprint of the resident. <br />There is a significant dip in the middle of the property where the proposed <br />residence is to be located. Both neighboring properties to the north and south are <br />at a higher elevation. If the corners rather than the midpoints of the rectangle <br />were used, the base elevation would be 83.5 feet rather than 79.9 fat when <br />measured at the midpoints. Measuring from the corner gives you an additional <br />3.6 feet of allowable height. This is why the City of Everett will allow the <br />residence to be built up to 30.6 fat in height, 2.6 fat above the 28 font height <br />limitation. <br />4. 77te inability of the applicant to derive reasoru7ble economic use of the property is <br />not the result of actions by the applicant in subdividing the property or adjusting <br />a boundary line thereby creating the undevelopable condition after the ef""ve <br />date of this Ordinance. The lot was created prior to the effective date of this <br />Ordinance. <br />5. The proposal mitigates the impacts on the environmentally sensitive areas to the <br />maximum extent possible. Conditions have been imposed upon the project which <br />will mitigate any potential environmental impacts. Mitigation requirements <br />includes placing permanent fencing along the edge of the remaining buffer and <br />recording a native growth protection easement covenant to protect the site's <br />remaining environmentally sensitive area. <br />Subsection 37.050.1) of the zoning code allows administrative modifications to building <br />setbacks, buffers, and building heights through Review Process I. The Planning <br />Director, using Review Process I, is authorized to "...approve, disapprove or approve <br />with conditions the use proposed by the applicant" (Subsection 42.100.11). <br />PAUL A. ROBERTS, DIRECTOR <br />PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT <br />